Possibly Looking for a Turntable/Cartridge Under $1000
I'm getting back into audio and trying to decide if I want to include a turntable and cartridge too. While I have collection of about 300+ LPs and EPs, for the most part I'm a digital guy at heart. All of my vinyl is over 30 years old. Once I heard the dynamics of CDs I never went back to vinyl and only did tapes in the car.
Of course vinyl overall fell out of favor for a while, but has since made a come back. I never understood the attraction to vinyl given the dynamics and headroom available with digital music. However, in getting back into audio I had a thought, that maybe I didn't see the appeal of vinyl because I've never had anything thing more than an entry level turntable.
My current system for 2-channel is Martin Logan SL3s, a Hegel P20 preamp, and currently I'm using an amp based on the Purifi EVAL1 Stereo 1ET400A module, though the amp could change later if I can swing a Hegel H30a.
I know my budget of $1000 is not high end level, but it's a little better than entry level. Given my setup, would a turntable/cartridge in the $1000 ballpark give me anything more in terms of sonic refinement and dynamics over an entry level turntable?
Thanks in advance.
Alright, this is probably going to trigger some audiophiles, but here it goes: the turntable doesn’t matter that much. I recently went full midlife crisis and “upgraded” to a Dr. Feickert Volare with a Kuzma tonearm and a Hana SH cart — the kind of setup that gets audiophiles hot under the platter. And guess what? Compared to my old Audio-Technica LP120 (with the same cartridge), the difference was… let’s just say, not “new Tesla vs. used Corolla” — more like “2025 Tesla vs. 2024 Tesla.” If I were buying today, with a budget of $1000, I’d look at the Fluance RT85 — great reviews, looks sharp, and it’s got that auto-lift at the end of a record so you’re not sprinting across the room like you’re disarming a bomb. Plus it comes with either the Ortofon 2M Blue or Nagaoka MP-110 cartridges, both of which punch way above their weight. Also, the Pro-Ject Debut Carbon EVO — the satin red wine color is pure sex appeal. And honestly, don’t sleep on pre-owned gear from TMRAudio.com — half the fun of this hobby is getting “gently used” equipment that was babied by someone who treated it better than their spouse. My advice: don’t lose sleep over the table. Pick one that looks sexy in your living room, then spend your money where it counts — on the cartridge and phono stage. Anything above $150 and you’re in the promised land. The AT VMN95ML? Killer value. And honestly, I did the side-by-side thing with pricier cartridges. The difference? Minimal. Like paying $100 for a bottle of wine instead of $30 — yeah, it’s different, but only if someone tells you it is. Don’t get me wrong, I love vinyl — the ritual, the tactile joy, the tiny crackle before the music kicks in. But let’s be real: unless your records are VG+ or mint, lossless streaming is going to sound cleaner. Vinyl is about romance, not accuracy. |
I would narrow down the choices by looking at features YOU want: - Height adjustable feet? Not on Rega's but can be upgraded with TNG-spinner. - Automatic or manual? I would go for manual, as automatic has more parts, which cost money and can break. - Built-in phono amp? I would go without, as it costs money and can be added separately at different levels of quality. - Cue lever present? [shockingly, some <$1K TT's don't have a cue lever!] - Options for upgrades? - Is switching 33/45 important? How easy is it? Button vs. belt change (with or without removal of platter)? - Look? Do you like 80's DJ appearance or modern minimalism? Re sound quality, they all will play records, at $1K level not the best SQ. Direct Drive vs belt drive is irrelevant here. Agree with other posters to take cleaning old records into consideration. Cleaning has more effect on SQ than any TT attribute. Enjoy your vinyl! |
licarijo I generally agree with you, it’s the cartridge that makes the most audible difference, and I wish I had auto lift, my after-market gizmo stopped cooperating. Ortofon older 2M body is only two options: red spherical or blue elliptical, both on aluminum, no advanced stylus for the older 2M body Ortofon New 2MR body https://ortofon.com/pages/2mr has a full range of stylus shape choices up to LVB 250 which is Shibata, and the only one that is Boron Cantilever, all others have aluminum cantilevers, spherical/elliptical/fine line/Shibata-Boron/78/Mono AT95 older design has a full line of stylus, but they have limited channel separation 23db, and all are aluminum cantilevers https://www.audio-technica.com/en-us/cartridges/line-series/at-vm95-series AT’s NEW VMX series includes 3 advanced shape stylus with boron cantilevers https://www.audio-technica.com/en-us/cartridges/line-series/vmx-series
As I mentioned above, most of these basic TT’s have fixed height arms. 1. removable headshell, then you can get a headshell that provides azimuth adjustability, 2. What inexpensive TT has a height adjustable arm? Easy is nicer, on the fly is terrific, but by any means (better than none), what is out there? I saw an Origin tonearm, it has the least friendly height adjustability, but, it does allow it: you need to loosen the mounting nut below the plinth, then adjust the similar nut above the plinth on the arm post up or down, then re-tighten the below plinth nut. Better than not possible. TRACKING FORCE. Always pay attention to the tracking force. Given any matching amount of contact surface, heavier will wear itself faster, thus ’less longer stylus life’ and wear your LP’s grooves more. Heavier is ok, but IF you can find a great choice that happens to track lighter, that’s my preference. My heavy trackers are only 2.0g, some are 1.25g, and lightest is Shure V15VxMR at 1.0g. Anti-skate is tricky, often set wrong. Lighter tracking has less inward skate naturally, therefore less force is involved opposing it, and by any amount of error is likely to be less force involved. I found ALL my dials to be inaccurate, I use tools and methods that measure and reveal visually and audibly.
|
