Tone arm vs Cartridge upgrades


Another question regarding upgrading the analogue section of my system.

In general is money better spent upgrading a cartridge vs tone arm?

Current tone arm is an Origin Live Silver and cartridge Soundsmith Zephyr Mk III on a Feikert Volare TT.  Using Leben electronics and DeVore O93 speakers.

Price point around 2K to spend.  ( Note there is a trade up program with Origin Live which would likely extend the actual price point on a tone arm).

Thanks, in advance for your insights.

rivinyl

I’ve used several arms and dozens of cartridges. There are certainly differences in arms, and egregious mechanical mismatches must be avoided - but IMO cartridges yield bigger sonic differences, and are far more fun to roll. Most cartridges in fact sound excellent once partnered to the right phono stage config - but also quite different. And sometimes the best sonic surprises aren’t the most expensive - many awesome sounding cartridges exist at more reasonable price points, and also from bygone eras. That’s why it’s fun. My preference in arms is a good solid gimbal w/ metal arm tube and removable headshells.

You can debate advanced resonances & energy management all day, fixate on lowering bearing friction towards zero, and convince yourself exotic arm tube materials & design are necessary to unlock the last bit of sound quality - but at the end of the day these don’t positively correlate to the kind of sound quality I’m after.

You arm & table seem solid. I’d focus on cartridge AND phono stage. 

Once you start playing at the higher end of cartridges, an improved tonearm can add quite a lot. I have a Dynavector XV-1s. Recently it was installed on a Clearaudio Tracer tonearm on my turntable and it really shined and played well. Not lone ago I moved it over to a Clearaudio 12" Universal tonearm on the same turntable. The Universal costs twice what the Tracer does, and is a much better tonearm. Playing the XV-1s on the Universal is as if I moved up the range to a next level cartridge. It's so much better. 

Whether $2k is better spent on an upgraded tonearm or upgraded cartridge depends. It's more about balance. Higher end cartridges may need a better tonearm to reveal what they are really capable of reproducing.The phono-stage is an important factor too.

Thanks for the all the advice.

Answers to above questions:

Its the Origin Live Silver based on the Rega tone arm

The phono stage is the Leben RS 30 EQ ( and it's quite nice - particularly with upgraded NOS tubes )

Post removed 

I look at a Tonearm as a Permanent Device (not deteriorating) which is an enabler for the Cartridge to carry out it's function.

I have owned over the years Cart's with/without removable Headshells. I did not have too much concerns for a removable Headshell as my Journey with a Tonearm Venture was aspiring to the SME IV or V, of which the I was acquired and used for many many years under the guise the investigation to discover better was over.

I was using LOMC and HOMC with this Tonearm mainly with ID TT's. 

An invite to meeting with ID TT enthusiasts resulted in my whole mindset being changed. A discovery was made about a Tonearm Design used on a TT being demo'd at the meeting.

The TA was a removable Headshell design which later underwent the removal of the SME Bayonet to a Interference Fit Design. 

The follow up A/B of the pre/post modified 

TA's using identical TT and Cart' showed the Pre modded version was superseded.

I have been involved with other design changes to the TA and am left with a different mindset to what a Cart' can be. 

A Cart' is sacrificial, it is not a design that through typical use can maintain a condition that is supplied from the factory. 

The Cart' is also quite reactive to the device it is mounted to, or part it is directly attached to. 

My experiences have shown a Tonearm with a removable Headshell but with a bespoke design for bearings and machining tolerances through removing and adding materials, has shown what might be considered a lesser design, due to the H'shell, create a much improved performance on a Cart' over a SME IV. 

The changes made to the removable H'shell's connecting to the Wand method brought about additional betterment. 

I advise to learn what is best to be in place on a Tonearm and do ones best to fully learn if the philosophy is implemented in a TA that presents itself as being of interest. 

A TA put to use, that incorporates a design that actually does what it is claimed to do! When coupled to a Cart' that is properly set up, will be formidable as a generator of a Signal. 

A much more expensive Cart' on a not so well functioning TA, will not compete in the overall quality stakes, it's short coming will quickly be found out and become a detractor.

As said the TA is the enabler of the Cart', it is not in reverse order.