Record Cleaner won't clean?? Or is it me?

@oberoniaomnia, 

Notice that the calculation in the record cleaning book are flawed as it goes from mass/weight to thickness without including density/specific gravity (6/0.5x12, particularly at value around 1 or 1/1=1). That's why those calculations are off by a factor of around 20K. I provided the back of the envelope math in a previous post. No need to sweat a few percent here or there when we are talking four orders of magnitude, give or take.

The calculations are not off by a factor of 20k.  They are off by a factor of 10, and this was delineated in these posts:

Audiogon Discussion Forum

Audiogon Discussion Forum

Hey OP

after reading the different post above, I concur that cleaning with a brush then vacuum clean is the better process. I came to that conclusion myself as that procedure gave me the best results. Brush and less vacuum

@antinn 

The sooner everybody adopts the metric system, the better!  Then we'd only have to worry about the position of the decimal point ...