Sorry to hear about that — very frustrating. Preamp/processors tend to use higher quality parts and are made in fewer numbers than AVRs that makes them more expensive, so If sound quality isn’t paramount I’d go with another AVR. I did a shoutout between Yamaha, Denon, Marantz, and Arcam and thought the Yamaha sounded best, and they’re also one of the most reliable brands as well, and If I were you I’d go with this. Best of luck.
What's the difference between Component processor and AVR receiver?
Hi all,
I have an older Marantz SR5011 that basically got bricked from a botched update. I had JUST added a new to me amp Emotiva XPA-5 and got to listen to it for maybe 5 mins before i tried the update. Very frustrating that the AVR failed at this point.
Looking to replace it now but the question is with what? Now that I have the separate amp, I can do a Surround processor or I can do another AVR receiver.
My question is, which is "Better"? Why are processors so much more expensive when the receivers seem to basically have the same capabilities?
I mostly use my system for streaming movies off of my PC so audiophile quality is not necessarily required.
Also feeling quite jaded with the whole experience with Marantz brand at the moment. And not knowing for sure but think Denon/Marantz/Yamaha are all of similar design are they not?
Was thinking of trying a different brand for sure.....
Any suggestions and answers appreciated.
J
- ...
- 8 posts total
What @soix said. I use a now discontinued Onkyo TX-RZ820 receiver as a surround processor. I don’t use any of the built-in amplifiers. It works well for me. I'm only using it for home theatre. It's not in the chain when I'm doing two channel. I’ve looked at surround processors and ultimately didn’t think they were worth the extra cash. I’m primarily a two channel guy and not a home theatre buff. |
- 8 posts total