Focal Kanta 2 and CODA 16 amp


Hello All,
My audio system was sounding really good but I felt the need to go further and recently upgraded a McIntosh MC152 amp to a Coda 16. What was missing? A certain bit of clarity, the ability to place instruments in the soundstage, and an amp that is consistent in quality with the rest of my equipment.

McIntosh is one of the amplifiers that pairs well with my Focal Kanta 2s. I thought about a more powerful McIntosh but didn’t go there, heard a Luxman M900u in a dealer’s showroom that was OK, but a demo of the Coda turned my head. The Coda is an eye-opener in the clarity and power it brings to the system, but it has thrown the balance off. I am now struggling to overcome some brightness with certain music (not all), a slight edge that I had previously managed to defeat by changing cables, rolling tubes in my preamp and adding the Mac.

My listening space is not ideal and can use acoustic treatment to tame the highs, but things sounded pretty good before. The focus and bulk of time (say 85%) is with home theatre, but when I play two channel, I want it to be high quality. An obvious path is to correct my mistake, sell the Coda and look elsewhere.  Another alternative is to keep this excellent amp and get a different (warmer?) preamp to better match the Coda (must have HT bypass and XLR connections), or perhaps something like a MiniDSP with Dirac to tweak the sound. I'm even contemplating warmer speakers to replace the Kantas, but that means three speakers (L/C/R) for home theatre.

I appreciate any words of wisdom or solace from Kanta and/or Coda owners on a strategy to manage this issue. Thanks,
Robert

traubr

There is definitely no shortage of effort on your part to achieve the sound you are looking for. Thanks for the thread, always good to read what other audiophiles have been doing in their journey to audio nirvana.

 I removed the filter yesterday and what do you know: the system sounded even better. 

As many have said, once one has the level of quality hifi components that you have acquired in your digital chain, everything matters. I have recently been reading on another forum about what many claim is such a huge difference with just the DC cable on the linear power supply on the modem. Crazy to believe. I don't even have a linear power supply on my modem (yet).

There are no shortage of variables to play with, 

Yup, choice is good. Here is another variable: Software

 I don't believe it was discussed previously, but at times, on certain tracks, I have found Squeeze was a little too hot, and going to Roon smoothed out some high frequency energy, similar to going from Telefunken to some "lesser" tube with less transparency and less high frequency extension. I would think Conductor is similar to Squeeze. 

Enjoy the process!

Removing the Muon filter was a good idea. 
I would also suggest to go back to all stock power cords to get a benchmark and to hear if any of your power cables negatively impact the sound. 

Hmmm, stock cords in place of my eclectic collection of name brand cords, eh?  Interesting idea.  I am fearful of what I might find, as the popular, well-reviewed cord(s) I once revered could be a dud and an impediment. Or, it could reinforce my faith, knowing that "better" cords are indeed better...

Fear not. The stock cords give you a reference point and sometimes help determine your next move. I’ve used this method more than once and it proved worthwhile in understanding what cabling the new components may need. It never convinced me that stock cords are better but it did point me in a right direction. Amplifier is the most impactful change in a system after speakers. You have worked hard to voice your setup and achieve synergy with your mcintosh. Now you need to do the same with coda. 
I went thru few amps in the last couple of years and I can tell you every amp change triggered additional changes including repositioning speakers. It’s never plug and play. 

Thanks for the inspirational talk on the sidelines, coach. Now it's back into the game! smiley