AI and how you use it.
How many of us ask AI before we pose a question on a forum? I have noticed that several times if I didn’t know the answer. I would go ask AI, and post the response, because it looks to be somewhat accurate. I usually do this if I’ve noticed someone hasn’t responded to an inquiry.
I’ve also noticed there is complaints that sometimes it’s not accurate. Funny how people are expecting a toddler to run like Usain Bolt. Give the child a couple years and it’s gonna blow all of our minds.
One last thing, a shout out to the admin for working through, which was obviously a hack from 🇰🇵 or 🇷🇺 and making the site usable once again.
AI can produce garbage or good answers. A lot depends on the intelligence of the effort put into the prompt. For example, one can delimit the sources AI draws from, provide a context and purpose for the question, and more. I’m very cautious about AI, but people who bash it without learning much about using it might was well criticize the dictionary because they opened it at random and didn’t get a good answer to their question. |
The more we use A.I. as an answer for truth the more stupid we will become... Because there is a trade-off between our own innate growing abilities which are in need to be worked by us alone thinking reading meditating, and the constant reference to an external power qualified as "superior" by deluded oligarchs owning it and some uneducated specialized "scientists" describing it as "superior" and ready to replace human intelligence and even consciousness (Kurzweil delusion ). The only rational use of A.I. is as a mere springboard to our own research and thinking... We can see it in audio, where people instead of reading about acoustics idolize audio guru ...Tomorrow it will be A.I. But it is not the place here for me to go further ... |
@hilde45 + 1 |
I love this line:
This is a very important value to preserve. I agree. Then there’s this line:
The only rational use? This morning I asked AI how to change a setting on my phone -- the answer was immediate and accurate. I asked it yesterday about how to re-set my Sonos system -- immediate and accurate answer. These were not springboards but complete answers. While the reply makes some sense to me, it gives in to hyperbole in defense of something very much worth defending. In other words, there’s at least more than one "rational" use to AI. Over and out.
|
You distorted my sentence..Read it again... You make a personal research about phone no ? The only rational use of A.I. is being springboard for personal research practical or theoretical... I guess there is many researchs possible and many thinking processes possible no ? Then you did well, using A.I. as springboard to help you and go possibly further on your own on this phone matter... A. I. was a springboard...The fact that you were satisfied by the A.I. directives dont makes my post preposterous... Your action is not a measure of truth... The habit to consult A.I. is not a measure of reason nor reason itself but just an habit for practical day to day necessities.. My post was about more than just that:habits. There is many researchs but only one reason as faculty or ability of the mind, the meaning intended is clearly here in my post described as the use of A.I. as our own thinking springboard... Not as a "know it all" resource which can dispense us of any further thinking or research...No hyperbole save in your mind... Need to remind you of the context of this A.I. posts : It was not just about practical use and habit but my post was about the trade-off implied long term.. You are a corrector i assume you know what a "context" of text is.
My reply make sense for anyone with good faith or mastery of English. Even if my English is "minimalisticaly" good as everyone know...
In a word: there is only one rational use of our own reason long term and short term: not using A.I. as a replacement of our own working mind... Not conflating A.I. with Reason itself...
« If you dont like the dog he sure has fleas» -- Groucho Marx
|
