Well said!
Thanks pindac...
I lately wonder why I’m an Audiophile.
Ever since I lately stopped obsessing over sound quality and started really listening to music I’m wondering why fidelity was so important to my appreciation. Not that I’m totally on the wagon. I still revel in hearing wonderful sound. It’s just not so all-important anymore. And, sometimes very poorly recorded recordings do turn me off.
It’s just freeing not being so obsessed.
@mylogic -1 Spending more on Vinyl and CD then audio gear in the past 55 years proves/says nothing. How large is your Vinyl/CD collection? How many purchases have you made that you currently have little or no interest in? Spending more on software vs. hardware does not prove anything regarding your passion for music. |
I think I know why I buy stuff and listen the way I do. I dislike the expression but I get more "drawn into" the music, and its performance, with my high end system than I do with (e.g.) my TV system. I restarted my audiophilia in the mid '90s and put together pretty good systems for NYC and my weekend home in VT by about 2000. I did not change anything then until my VT digital stuff failed and a new CD/SACD player was installed in 2008. On retirement in 2013 everything was consolidated into one system and I sold or gave away most of the left over components. Since retirement I have had more time to listen to music, I am no longer training as a competitive cyclist and I cannot ski for 7 hours a day on weekends or play 36 holes of golf! So I started tweaking and upgrading to get closer to the performance. I listen exclusively to "classical" music, a genre where there may be over 100 different recordings of the same work. There have been 160+ recordings of the cycle of Beethoven symphonies as an example; I suspect that this is not the case for other genres. Listening to different performances of a work is a pleasure, and having a system that clearly displays even subtle nuance of performance enhances the experience. I will admit that, on occasion, I find myself listening to the quality of the sound rather than the music; typically this happens for a while after I have changed a component. This last year has seen major changes, a SACD player/DAC (K-01XDSE), power amp TU-8900 (then rolling tubes in that, WE 300Bs vs RCA 2A3s, Brimar vs Amperex ECC82s), cartridge (Koetsu RSP), new phono stage (Dos Locos) and new interconnects (Cardas Clear Reflection except for the Transparent Super Phono). I do try to distinguish between a critical listening session and a relax into the music session. For me the details just add to the enjoyment, the sense of the space, feeling the vibrations of the wooden body of a string instrument and the like. So, I am an audiophile because listening to music brings me such peace and joy, and putting the system together has been FUN, its own voyage of discovery, just as is finding new music, or new performances of music I already know.
|
I spend the price of a house on books... I spend the price of a car on albums... I spend 1000 bucks on my actual sound system/room... I like as much being an audiophile as listening music as reading books.. But there is an order of priority even between my three equal passions... Anyway without book on acoustic and music , i could not have been able to understand Bruckner or Scriabin music , nor solve my system/room acoustics... And as said Chesky the audiophile quoted in another thread "everything is a bell" then acoustics is for me not just science and technology but philosophy... Without books i would have never understood this simple fact by myself alone... Then thanks to the OP for another interesting thread...
|