@bigtwin 

The major work that we have been developing is a bias supply that uses a miniscule amount of the audio power from the amplifier to develop the bias voltage. This eliminates the AC power cord, but does not have any effect on the sound quality. 

I believe the operative words here are "miniscule amount".  So excuse me if I have trouble understanding how a better power cable is going to make a HUGE difference. 

The "miniscule amount" has nothing to do with power cord differences or the sound differences between the old and new generation models.  Read Roger’s response again.  The "miniscule amount" refers to the new design just skimming off a tiny bit of the audio signal to derive the bias voltage that was previously derived from the 120v.  Power cords are no longer required.  How cool is that! 

There are so many power cords that get rave reviews in these forums.  I have tried many of these and many are downright horrible.   And yes, as a courtesy to the manufacturer or due to claims here about cable burn-in, I will run them for a week or two, somewhere else in the house, then try them again in my system.  The burned-in cable still rarely survives. And I don’t need that cable to settle in before it performs any better.  This is also silly.  The instant I put my cable back in, without any settle time, the magic immediately returns.

If someone says that power cords don’t make a difference, either the power cord they are using is overrated or junk, or the system is low resolution to show the difference.  So don’t come to a general conclusion just because the PU cables don’t make a difference.  In the SL speakers, power cords CAN make a huge difference.

And swapping one for another because one "has more warmth" or "greater extended trebles" never makes any sense.  Picking cables because of tonal incoherencies is a no-win situation once you make a change elsewhere in your system.

@dayglow writes 

Assuming this power cord is a fraud or scam is irresponsible and ignorant. Considering none of the naysayers have heard this PC implemented in a top level Aavik/Borresen system. Why so difficult to give Ansuz the benefit of doubt? The critizing of ultra HEA has less relevance regarding the product but one's own personal issues.

Okay, so Ansuz, Aavik and Børrensen are the same company, suggesting some kind of synergy between their various product lines. From your post we infer that those products are held in high esteem, at least in certain circles.

We can safely surmise Børrensen's entry-level made-in-China home theater speakers aren't included in that elevated praise. But Aavik's $70,000 I-880 integrated amp ought to be.

Let's see! Here is a quote from Aavik I-880 webpage:

Aavik have designed a circuitry that constantly keeps the bias spread 0,63 V above the required current, no matter where it is in the cycle.

Expressing current in volts is of course absurd, but looking past that we see that the architecture being described looks suspiciously, at least in concept, like Bob Carver's M-series amps' from the early 80s.

Aavik I-880 also boasts a digital-domain encoder volume control, like your average Eversolo DAC, and switching-mode power supplies. All for $70,000. You get what you pay for!

But maybe it sounds great!

In any event, another emperor with, well, maybe not no clothes, maybe this emperor wears an open-backed hospital gown.

Idiotphilia.

"Without listening to this cable you cannot claim scam"

..but stating as any amplifier/etc. , including top performing ones with excellent cable supplied (rare these days, but still some available, for ex. esoteric etc), will change the sound, is less than truth! :-)

@lanx0003 +1