Single way or multiway


The founder and builder of the highly respected high-end speaker company Gauder AkustikDr. Gauder, says that using a full-range driver is very bad. He uses 3- to 4-way speakers with extremely complex 10th-order crossovers consisting of 58–60 components.

In contrast, some other well-known and equally respected speaker companies — such as Voxativ, Zu, Cube Audio, and Totem — use crossoverless designs.

Who is right, and who is wrong?

bache

Somehow owners of audio companies always say their way is right, and other people are doing it wrong.

What can one learn from that?

@bache 

Gauder is not doing anything unusual- basically three way designs with near infinite slope crossovers.  

Joseph Audio also uses infinite slope high order crossover designs.  The main reason for this is that certain speaker drivers and driver materials that offer a higher level of clarity also have a limited useable frequency range because of distortion (see the link for the magnesium cone SEAS driver).  

these SEAS magnesium drivers are super clear sounding but have ultra high breakup distortion after their useable frequency.  in other words the output level after the low pass crossover needs to drop off in a hurry so that the breakup is not audible to the user.  

Many speakers have much less distortion and a wider useable frequency range and therefore do not require steep slopes or complex crossovers in their designs. 

 

https://www.madisoundspeakerstore.com/8-woofers-6-to-8-ohm/seas-excel-w22nx001-graph-e0077-8-graphene-cone-woofer/?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=20727061620&gbraid=0AAAAAD_AChEl9-jLyIqCHzRzOKSmrWtEU&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI-q_dhcjRjgMVrkd_AB1UrB8QEAQYASABEgJiXfD_BwE

and he will be right. Playing with a singular driver that may beam too early, ring at its breakup mode frequency is madness to me, but I guess companies must find their gimmicks.

but one doesn't need an overly complex crossover system to get class leading presentation of sound

Who is right, and who is wrong?

I disagree with your leading premise that there is a “right vs wrong”.

Perhaps if a single driver can do the speed of treble down to bass that can move enough air would be ideal, but doesn’t exist.  Therefore tradeoffs are inevitable- there is no perfect speaker design.

Also, there’s “higher efficiency” that’s seems to be ignored when comparing Guader offerings to high efficiency Voxative and Zu, the latter which can run on very low powered amplifiers down to SET tubes Sonics.

I’m a fan of Gauder’s products indicating excellent engineering, but I do not reach farther in declaring them “the” global spokesman for what is best/right/wrong.  

 

 

The issue with single driver speakers is covering  the entire freq spectrum humans are capable of hearing. I've owned Omega and Jordan single drivers, both were unsatisfactory in this regard. I suppose one could add subs and super tweeters, but I'd expect major problems with integrating them, and you've lost the principle of simplicity. 

More to discover