@verdantaudio I too have found Roon best with core and endpoint/renderer segregated, in my case two streamers run in bridged mode.
Sound quality differences in streamers
Can there be sonic differences between moderate and high priced streamers when used for streaming only. I will not use or engage an onboard DAC or any other feature, just stream from Tidal or Amazon to DAC. If the unit is just transferring zeros and ones to a DAC can there be differences in say a $300 WiiM and a $3000 dSC streamer? Thanks
- ...
- 160 posts total
@verdantaudio - As with @sns, I too prefer the Roon server operating core to be separate from the endpoint/renderer. My first server/streamer (after moving away from my customized Mac mini) was the Antipodes DX a one-box server/streamer, similar to the current K50. Based on my successful time with the DX, I am sure the K50 is a great sounding unit. However, I have found that separating the server and streamer offers potential benefits that work well for me, including,
Of course, there is more than one way to get good sound and many prefer to simply purchase a single, high-performing, one-box solution like the Antipodes DX or Oladra, Grimm MU1 or MU2, Aeon 432 EVO, or similar. |
@mitch2 i agree wholeheartedly. The only caveat I would make is that the K50 and Oladra may be one box but they each have two computers and a clock in them. That is, a high powered server, a separate mid powered endpoint and then a clock. Two separate computers/motherboards with discrete power supplies. The only thing that is common is the power cord and the chassis. The others mentioned are one box solutions with one computer. |
- 160 posts total

