What does 90% of the Absolute Best Sound Cost?


Like many things, I have come to believe that the cost of incremental improvements in audio come at exponentially increasing costs - e.g., big improvement from $5K to $10K, less so from $10 to $15K, etc. All of us have our limits regarding what we can/will spend to achieve our best possible/practical audio experience. So, a couple of questions that I am sure are at least somewhat subjective.

A. What does it cost, in terms of components, interconnects, and direct furnishings (e.g., racks, isolation pads, surface room treatments, etc.) to achieve 90% of the absolute best sound possible?

B. What % does $50,000 get you?

FWIW, my setup is at about $21,000 actual cost ($32,000 original retail) and I am really happy with it right now. All of my incremental spend for the next couple of years is going to be working the room itself. Looking forward to your perspectives!

mattsca

My system is about $150K. For me, it is a destination system.

Even though I know that I could do much better.

And I am clear that I am not at 90 or 95% of “the absolute sound”.

If it could be quantified, maybe 50%.

But it is also clear that the law of diminishing returns applies.

Please also understand that ignorance does not imply intelligence.

Only lack of experience.

And delusion is an extremely common state of most audiophiles.

All I know is that my system is way good enough.

Post removed 

Not "somewhat subjective" but rather 100% subjective.

I doubt anyone here has heard the absolute best system, as there is no such thing.

The price for quality sound has gotten to the point where if you listen with your ears and not your wallet or eyes, you can get a great set of monos for sub $600.  And I'm guessing other components in the chain would follow the trend.

Just my opinion so please don't let it ruffle any feathers.