Hagerman trumpet mc or Ear 834 classic phono pre amplifier.


Need some advice on these  phono amplifiers.This is the last piece of equipment for my system.

bigmac1963

The EAR classic is using built-in step-up transformers (SUT) for MC gain. These transformers are likely to be much cheaper than the transformers in their wonderful standalone MC-4 SUT box ($2200 on its own), and don’t have any of its loading/gain flexibility either (4 gain levels!). If you’re going to compare the Trumpet MC’s MC stage (JFET) in isolation to an EAR MC-4, then I’d say the MC-4 wins for most MC cartridges (not all!), but the Trumpet hangs very close on overall musicality - closer than most.

Having not heard the EAR Phono Classic myself (like @bkeske ), but having a Trumpet MC and an EAR MC-4 (and MC-3) and a slew of other phono gear to extrapolate against - I’d be surprised if the Classic’s built-in transformers can match the Trumper MC’s JFET stage in musicality - and certainly falls far behind it in flexibility. The built-in transformers were an oft-decried weakness of the prior 843P phono stage (assuming they’re similar here).

As @bkeske noted the noise floor of the Trumpet MC is a little higher than you’d expect from a SUT + tube MM stage combo, or even other JFET + tube MM stages. That’s its main weakness. I’m not a stickler for ultra-low noise so I pay it little mind. It’s also tilted to a warm sound, which I like, and you can tweak this with tube rolling.

I just wanted to add a note, as I was typing quickly while working....I mistakingly typed 12ay7's....that should have been 12au7's. Sorry about that.

What cartridge does OP have …. ? in my mind an essential bit of info… 

What tube has the most influence to the sound that comes from the phono pre amplifier 12ax7 or 12au.

@bigmac1963

ax7’s generally effect tonality, gain, and noise….au7’s effect body, weight, and dynamics….that according to Jim Hagerman.

I cannot argue with that generally per my experience with the Trumpet.