All Pre 1970 Vintage speakers suck! Prove me wrong


Have tried many vintage speakers.

My conclusion: All pre-1970 vintage speakers suck. Well-made but crappy  sound.

Used with both vintage amps and modern.

I do like many vintage amps such as Radio Craftsmen RC-500, Marantz tube, Scott tube, Heath W5, Lafayette and Pilot tube.

But back to pre-1970 speakers:

No bass, harsh, or honky mids and no highs. Not musical or listenable to me.

Tried many including Acoustic Research AR-3a, 2Ax, etc. The entire AR product line. Also Klipsch Horn, Large EVs. Altec VOTT. Pioneer CS-88 and 99.

Nothing pre 1970 is even close to the better modern speakers.

I challenge you: Prove me wrong.

lion

Looks like the lion is nothing more than a little pussy   cat.

 

Where is the lion hiding?

Some think, I heard, that Grand Utopia are one of three-five top speakers. They sound great even on youtube, that I can tell. Yeah, a bit expensive, not too big, though, quite manageable. VAC and Alnic electronics are popular choices with them.

There are probably one hundred speakers that qualify for the top five.  I certainly have heard but a small fraction of the speakers designed as statement products.  A friend who attends the Munich show and some shows in Japan throws out names of companies I have never even heard of their names.  I doubt that there would be anything close to a consensus of what companies should be near the top of the list if you polled those who have heard a lot of different speakers. 

Depending on the type of sound you like, the list would vary greatly and even if my taste differs dramatically from someone else, I would respect that list.  If, for example, someone put the Borresen flagship at the top of the list, I know that person favors open top end, speed, clarity and precise imaging (which are all good things), but, my own preference would be for a fuller sound and greater "weight" to the sound.  Would I put the Gobel flagship near the top (weighty, big sound)?  Maybe, but, it requires a lot of power which means the kind of amps I tend not to favor, so I would not know for sure unless I heard it in a familiar setting (which would never happen).  Would I put up for consideration a low-cost speaker with limitations on bass response, high volume capability, etc., but is SO musically satisfying (Charney Audio Companion)?  Yes, I might, and not just because it is reasonably price, compact , and practical (it is also high in efficiency); it just plain sounds good.  The same with the Songer Audio field coil speakers I've heard--lacking in deep bass, but very musical and reasonably practical.  The Rosso Fiorentino speakers?  I don't know, I heard and liked them, but, I need to hear them more.  It is pretty much impossible for me to make my own list of top fives, never mind someone compiling a more universal top five list.  My own personal list would not even have commercial systems on it--I've heard a number of custom builds that sound better than any commercial models I've heard.  

The problem is ALL speakers suck. They still do. Just that they are better.