Dcs Verona vs Scarlatti master clock

Now I got the idea the Scarlatti Dac is the first target for improvement from the previous Dcs stack. Jb, I have just read from avguide forum and one user who also is a Dcs dealer mentioned about his surprising dicovery. He prefers to upsampling to 176,4khz using Purcell to the Scarlatti Dac more than the usual Dsd upsampling. Unfortunately, he specified that a pair of Nordost Odin balanced cables were being used. That's too expensive for me to try.

I use LessLoss RCA SPDIF digital cable from the Lector transport to the Purcell and a pair of LessLoss AES/EBU cables from Purcell to Scarlatti. I've no desire to upgrade from those cables. You may consider emailing Liudas at LessLoss. I believe him to be someone who understands digital technology very well.

Jb, I'm using 4 lessloss power cables for my amps and very satisfied with them. How much you pay for the lessloss aes-ebu?

Suchart: It was a while back, but I believe about $300.

Hi,

I would be quite surprised if there was a big difference in the performance from the Verona to the scarletti clock.
I have sent in my verona clock due to a power up problem, received it back with information that it now was equal to the new version but I could not detect any noticable difference.
The verona is almost new on the marked as well and most likely there was not any reason to introduce new clock's from a technical point of view, but of course new design for the transport/dac are most likely the main reason.

Gfe
Norway