What is the “World’s Best Cartridge”?


I believe that a cartridge and a speaker, by far, contribute the most to SQ.

The two transducers in a system.

I bit the bulllet and bought a Lyra Atlas SL for $13K for my Woodsong Garrard 301 with Triplanar SE arm. I use a full function Atma-Sphere MP-1 preamp. My $60K front end. It is certainly, by far, the best I have owned. I read so many comments exclaiming that Lyra as among the best. I had to wait 6 months to get it. But the improvement over my excellent $3K Mayijima Shilabi was spectacular-putting it mildly.

I recently heard a demo of much more pricy system using a $25K cartridge. Seemed to be the most expensive cartridge made. Don’t recall the name.

For sure, the amount of detail was something I never heard. To hear a timpani sound like the real thing was incredible. And so much more! 
This got me thinking of what could be possible with a different kind of cartridge than a moving coil. That is, a moving iron.

I have heard so much about the late Decca London Reference. A MI and a very different take from a MC. Could it be better? The World’s Best? No longer made.

However Grado has been making MI cartridges for decades. Even though they hold the patent for the MC. Recently, Grado came out with their assault on “The World’s Best”. At least their best effort. At $12K the Epoch 3. I bought one and have been using it now for about two weeks replacing my Lyra. There is no question that the Atlas SL is a fabulous cartridge. But the Epoch is even better. Overall, it’s SQ is the closest to real I have heard. To begin, putting the stylus down on the run in grove there is dead silence. As well as the groves between cuts. This silence is indicative of the purity of the music content. Everything I have read about it is true. IME, the comment of one reviewer, “The World’s Best”, may be true.
 

 

mglik

Raul,

On several occasions I heard A system I am familiar with that had a replacement solid state power supply in it while it’s regular tungar tube power supply was being worked on or was out on loan to someone else.  Both times I commented on the sound being “off” when I didn’t even know that the solid state supply was being used.  In a different system, a friend of mine tried his Feastrix solid state power supply in place of another tungar supply, for a direct comparison, and again the tube supply was superior.  The drivers that were involved were Western Electric 555 midrange compression drivers.  It is a mystery to me why there should be much of a difference, one way or the other because in these instances, the supply is only being asked to deliver 24 volts dc.

Just a rhetorical question. If you are buying 15k, 20k or even a 30k cartridge I'm assuming you already have a 40k, 50k, 75k turntable and maybe a 20k plus tonearm? Not to mention the price of a phono stage and the associated cables. 

Maybe, but I know some people with Thorens 124 or Garrard 301 or 401 tables and  top Koetsus.  A local dealer put together a $1.5 million system with a reconditioned 124 and Koetsu Blue Lace.  

i hate to reduce things to dollars as a justification. lots of vintage tt’s that are very capable have more reasonable acquisition costs.

my three tt’s are not cheap. the CS Port LFT1 including the linear tracking arm is currently listing around $55k. my Saskia lists at $54k with one arm board. i have 7 arm boards. my Wave Kinetics NVS tt lists at $50k. two of my tone arms are the $15k Durand Tosca. one is my new $28k Primary Control FCL.

the point is that it does take a certain level of turntable to enable arms and cartridges to not be held back. i’ve owned the NVS for 11 years. i bought the CS Port new 4 years ago, and the Saskia used 4 years ago. so these are part of a long term plan of system building. i wanted to have a great direct drive tt, belt driven tt, and idler tt to enjoy each drive type at a high level.

Regarding field coil ps variables @atmasphere has posted in the topic. Maybe he can help us here ( yet again )