So, me and an audiophile friend got together to sort this out.
All the caveats were resolved. Both NUC and Aurender used USB, both were fed by Tidal. Now the surprise was that NUC beat Aurender by a nice margin.
The Aurender sounded cleaner and more audiophile but more analytical and lacking lower end bass (hence cleaner we felt).
Roon ROCK on NUC had better bass and was more natural sounding.
Go figure.
Hmmmm...now if I add a fanless chasis and LPS to my NUC it might sound even cleaner and beat Aurender in every which way.
The N200 is going back.
Anyone talking about noisy network or noisy USB etc are missing the point. This is a shootout under identical conditions. Roon + NUC vs Aurender N200 running Aurender software.
This thread might sound like heresy to the "source is as important as DAC" crowd, but I am as surprised as you are, and frankly quite disappointed.
Conclusion: Roon has done a fantastic job with Roon ROCK that has obviated the reason for a music server unless you want to spend the big bucks (>6000$ I am assuming, and even that needs some testing).
Also Roon has a UI next to none, a nice bonus.
Roon on mac mini was always meh, Audirvana sounded better, but not the same with roon rock.
Also: Am now thinking of buying roon permanent license.

