What do we hear when we change the direction of a wire?


Douglas Self wrote a devastating article about audio anomalies back in 1988. With all the necessary knowledge and measuring tools, he did not detect any supposedly audible changes in the electrical signal. Self and his colleagues were sure that they had proved the absence of anomalies in audio, but over the past 30 years, audio anomalies have not disappeared anywhere, at the same time the authority of science in the field of audio has increasingly become questioned. It's hard to believe, but science still cannot clearly answer the question of what electricity is and what sound is! (see article by A.J.Essien).

For your information: to make sure that no potentially audible changes in the electrical signal occur when we apply any "audio magic" to our gear, no super equipment is needed. The smallest step-change in amplitude that can be detected by ear is about 0.3dB for a pure tone. In more realistic situations it is 0.5 to 1.0dB'". This is about a 10% change. (Harris J.D.). At medium volume, the voltage amplitude at the output of the amplifier is approximately 10 volts, which means that the smallest audible difference in sound will be noticeable when the output voltage changes to 1 volt. Such an error is impossible not to notice even using a conventional voltmeter, but Self and his colleagues performed much more accurate measurements, including ones made directly on the music signal using Baxandall subtraction technique - they found no error even at this highest level.

As a result, we are faced with an apparently unsolvable problem: those of us who do not hear the sound of wires, relying on the authority of scientists, claim that audio anomalies are BS. However, people who confidently perceive this component of sound are forced to make another, the only possible conclusion in this situation: the electrical and acoustic signals contain some additional signal(s) that are still unknown to science, and which we perceive with a certain sixth sense.

If there are no electrical changes in the signal, then there are no acoustic changes, respectively, hearing does not participate in the perception of anomalies. What other options can there be?

Regards.
anton_stepichev

@dletch
I just read someone claimed the location of an instrument shifted 1/3 of the soundstage due to, wait for it .... wait for it .... copper wire. We have entered the twilight zone.


Such an experiment is conducted to subjectively evaluate the "loudness" of the wire. First, the sound stage shift is detected, then the balance is restored using the volume control and the difference is measured. On a transparent system, the difference in "loudness" between some type of wires in such an experiment can reach several DB.
Sure it is twilight zone for most people.
Essien also claims Ohm is flawed and Helmholz is just as wrong. Better toss those Resonators.

Today, we know that Ohm's acoustical law (1843) is irredeemably flawed; and Helmholtz's resonance (or place) theory (1877) is just as wrong.

If you have the same wire on both sides, there is no need for balance control, assuming the wires are manufactured with any sort of consistency.  I was mistaken though, they blamed it on the wire being stranded. Obviously it is not a stranded wire issue, but something simple that was missed. Back to the twilight zone.
My only thought for this topic is so what?

If someone sold you directional wire, especially expensive directional wire and forgot to tell you which way is the right way, I’d find another more competent vendor. Or maybe it just really does not matter? There is always something else one can find to obsess over.  Or if playing with wires is simply what floats ones boat, more power to you.
I am keeping tabs on threads these days....this one goes under "totally useless". That’s being kind. Gaslighting people is even worse than useless.
Coming from Albert Einstein this remark will be a sign, but how could you decide for all  of us,what is useless, useful, or simply interesting  or anything between the two extremes?

 The tentation to insult people is too much attractive to the alternative, like reading an article or a book?

 i suggest to you to read Essien article suggested by Anton  then your time will be valued coming in this thread you dare to despise in the name of all....I just buy it 50 bucks....

Then FOR MY own account of usefullness among all threads it is a very useful one.... Reading a book is more useful than readin insulting posts...

 Sorry....