You may have read the entire email exchange, but unfortunately didn’t understand it.
It was apparently stated on one of UpTone’s emails, to which the OP agreed to, contrary to what thyname states, that in LIEU of performing the warranty work, a NEW LPS-1.2 would be sent, with the price differential of $250 to be paid by mikey8811, which meant a DISCOUNT of $185 because now Uptone didn’t have to perform the warranty work on the junky LPS-1 that Alex had sent him.
Alex says (according to thyname) "I could spend a couple of hours unpacking his long post and replying point-by-point, but instead--for full transparency-- am going to paste the entirely of our 10 month long exchange.
…
and treated him with respect throughout more than a dozen e-mail exchanges.
…
Below is our ENITRE e-mail chain--with not a single word changed.
…
Anyone is free to ask me questions. I have zero to hide. Please judge for yourselves.Thanks,
ALEX CRESPI "
But that isn’t the ENTIRE e-mail chain, it is only seven out of the twelve, so I’ll ask to see the other ones too, which apparently show the deal that Alex offered to mikey8811.
Quoting thyname "And then for some reason the OP disposed of the LPS-1 (??!) "and still asks for the money back on it." To explain again, once Uptone essentially purchased the remaining warranty of the junky LPS-1, that value, in this case $185 which was the amount set by Alex, becomes the property of mikey8811. Uptone didn’t ask for the LPS-1 to be sent back, it obviously didn’t have enough value to Alex to pay for the return shipping to him, so mikey8811 can toss it in the trash if he wants to, but of course would do the responsible thing and recycle it. Now thyname is correct, at this point the warranty is void, because mikey8811 agreed to the deal offered by Uptone. Anybody who would get that specific LPS-1 would have no warranty, and people would have to rely on the honesty of mikey8811 if he ever somehow sold it.
It really isn’t complex. A $435 item was sold for $250 with a $185 credit for the LPS-1 warranty voiding, Alex at Uptone is the person who offered the deal, so there is more responsibility on his end.
Quoting thyname again, "And then, the LPS-1.2 is somehow on a new box, but not new, at which point it becomes “he said / she said”, as we would never know," I am only in disagreement because I believe that Uptone did send a new one. It really wouldn’t make any sense at all to send a problem item to a customer who is already complaining. But then the fact that Alex says to just put a piece of tape in it to stop the board from rattling would be enough for me to want to return it for a refund.
So, in the end Uptone has an extremely unhappy customer, willing to spend his time pursuing this, since apparently the credit card company did not reimburse him for the $250 charge. And all this is just for the price of return shipping of the new (or used?) LPS-1.2, which as thyname stated, is a "he said / she said" situation, but nonetheless Alex refuses to pay that, because in the end Alex is hoping to be the $185 ahead for not performing the warranty work of the original LPS-1, and only offering the $250 as a refund, which is unfair.

