New Joseph Audio Pulsar Graphene 2

I waited 3 years until I decided to purchase a new TV, a 75" Sony 940C over the LG OLED, both top of the line.  The Sony gives me at least 30 degree excellent picture quality and combined with the size, five people can easily have a great picture 12' away.  (The LG had issues with brightness limitations and judder).  Prior to that, I purchased plasmas over LCDs for my parents because the LCDs looked worse and had limited viewing angles.

I really hated the head in a vise ML Quests and only slightly better larger Monolith IIIs.  I should audition the Joseph Pearl 3s if they also have a wide listening area, good imaging and depth.  Although they are low in sensitivity, they have an easy impedance.  I would use my 130 W tube monoblocks with ample current to drive them.  I just hope that they have a wide dynamic range and that I could enjoy listening at quiet levels as well as loud levels (like I do with 98db efficient Legacy Focus).

fleschler,

Honestly I wouldn't be expecting the Joseph speakers to have the same kind of low-level-listening performance as something like a 98db efficient speaker.  In fact if anything I found the Joseph speakers could use some volume to get them to open up dynamically. 


Mark reports more satisfactory performance at low listening levels for the "2" version, so that sounds promising.  I'd certainly welcome that.

@fleschler I second prof's comment above. The Pearl 3s really shine when they get juice (your 130W tube monos is plenty of power) but they need the volume up somewhat--it doesn't need to be outlandish but you've probably been spoiled on low-level listening with your highly efficient speakers. Everything else (wide listening area, imaging and depth) is positive. 

With the right power amp, the Pulsars sound terrific at low levels.