One of the advantages of a proper balanced (differential) circuit is that it minimizes the interaction with the balanced interconnect cable and makes it much less critical.
If aftermarket premium power cords work, why won’t short runs of premium XLR cables work?
I have followed many threads, where people swear premium power cables greatly benefit your sound. I haven’t decided, as the last time I tried a power cable was twenty years ago. I used a Transparent power cord and was on the fence. If adding a power cable improves the sound and it’s only the last few feet of your voltage source, what would make extending a premium XLR cable any different? If I understand the argument, per se, the premium power cord acts as a filter. XLR cables are mostly unsupcetable to outside interference. I’m sure I will be versed here one way or the other.
- ...
- 12 posts total
See the power cord discussion (posted on the Galen Carol website) by Caelin Gabriel of Shunyata Research. It addresses a few of the widely held beliefs and assumptions about power cords. I found it helpful. I’m not clear on your question re PCs vs balanced ICs, so can’t help there. Sorry. https://www.gcaudio.com/tips-tricks/why-power-cables-make-a-difference/ |
XLR cables are easily extended, if the source supports the balanced standard. If not, its a bit of a crap shoot. http://www.atma-sphere.com/Resources/balanced.php |
I think that what Handymann is asking is that since a well chosen power cord is often said to provide a benefit, despite its short length relative to the much longer length of the wiring that is upstream of it, why wouldn’t a short length of XLR cable also provide a benefit. And I suspect he is asking that because a number of people have claimed in various threads here that balanced XLR interfaces are only beneficial if the run length is long. In response, I would first emphasize that the technical considerations involved in supplying AC power to a component are completely different than the technical considerations that are involved in communicating analog audio signals between components. So I wouldn’t extrapolate any conclusions or expectations from one situation to the other. Second, the people claiming that balanced XLR interfaces necessarily provide no benefit if the run length is short are incorrect. If the components being connected have well designed balanced interface circuits, and especially if they support the balanced standard Ralph referred to, balanced XLR interconnections can reduce sensitivity to cable differences (as Cleeds mentioned), can reduce susceptibility to ground loop issues, can reduce noise levels, and can provide higher overall system gain, regardless of length. And also, contrary to what is sometimes said here, regardless of whether or not the components are "fully balanced," meaning regardless of whether they have balanced internal signal paths. However, my understanding is that the majority of audio components having balanced interfaces do not conform to that standard. So in those cases an XLR interconnection may provide better results or worse results than an RCA interconnection, depending on the specific designs. And perhaps depending also on how AC power is distributed to the interconnected components. (For example, if power is supplied by a single dedicated line vs. by separate dedicated lines, or from the same power conditioner, or from a power conditioner to upstream components but with the amplifier plugged directly into the wall outlet. Those alternatives can affect ground loop-related issues, to which a well-designed balanced interface will be less susceptible than an unbalanced interface). So as is usual in audio, it all depends :-) Regards, -- Al |
- 12 posts total