Tekton Double Impacts


Anybody out there heard these??

I have dedicated audio room 14.5x20.5x9 ft.  Currently have Marantz Reference CD/Intergrated paired to Magnepan 1.7's with REL T-7 subs.  For the vast majority of music I love this system.  The only nit pick is that it is lacking/limited in covering say below 35 hz or so.  For the first time actually buzzed the panel with an organ sacd. Bummer.  Thought of upgrading subs to rythmicks but then I will need to high pass the 1.7's.  Really don't want to deal with that approach.

Enter the Double Impacts.  Many interesting things here.  Would certainly have a different set of strengths here.  Dynamics, claimed bottom octave coverage in one package, suspect a good match to current electronics.

I've read all the threads here so we do not need to rehash that.  Just wondering if others out there have FIRST HAND experience with these or other Tekton speakers

Thanks.
corelli
Post removed 
Perkri,

If your question is how do the DI's compare to the VSA VR-33's I can shed some light on that as I own both.  The 33's took forever to break in--almost sent them back.  But after 300hr they evolved into a very nice speaker.  Easy to drive, they sound very nice with tubes or SS.  The BIG advantage for some is that this speaker was designed to sound great up against the front wall.  So in some situations this is a big advantage.  I have them in a large open room and they sound far better with a seated position towards the rear of the room.  This is not a speaker that sounds great in near field applications. They really open up when there is more reflected sound

The DI's however best the 33's in just about every other respect.  The DI's are a bit more dynamic, have better clarity and detail, have much better impact in the bass and midbass.  I would never listen to the DI's up against the front wall.  Pulled well out into the room and maximizing first arrival information they image beautifully and outclass the 33's here too.

Both these speakers are excellent values for the money.  The 33's have have fewer higher quality drivers and a much better dead cabinet.  But the DI's, despite their economy cabinet, win out overall.  Driver quality  is good to very good--but the key to the great sound is in the driver implementation/tweeter array. 

Thanks Corelli!

Thats some great insight!

Appreciate the comparison. 

This helps a lot.

Not going to be pulling the trigger for a bit, but will continue following this thread and see where I end up!

p
@perkri  I was actively considering Harbeth and auditioned the Super HL5Plus in depth. I spent some time with the 30.1s but was more interested in the soon to be released 40.2s. I really liked the HL5+ and believe I'd be happy if I had moved forward with one of the Harbeth speakers.

I'm speaking from memory and the comparison is disparate in time...but I would give the overall nod to the Double Impacts (mine have the upgrade) UNLESS you have a natural preference for the Harbeth sound.

All the best in your quest. 
The unique thing I like about Tekton in general is they buck the predominate trend in high end audio in recent years towards smaller, less efficient, and still increasingly expensive speakers.

Size matters with speakers and drivers and so does efficiency if done well.    As does cost, needless to say.

So they seem to have found a nice niche with not much competition at their price points currently.  Smart!