HDMI vs 5.1 analog connection


My processor is not HDMI audio capable....but it has 5.1 analog to connect to my Blu Ray player.

Theoretically or realistically, which will yeild the best sound, HDMI or the 5.1 analog connection?

Should I look to get a processor with HDMI audio or is the 5.1 analog as good?

Also, does digital coax cable produce better sound than an optical cable?
128x128mitch4t
1. The issue of whether HDMI or 5.1 is "better" depends on the signals you are concerned with (does your player decode and/or transmit the HD audio tracks?) and whether you want to use the DSP/bass management in the processor. I believe that, with modern equipment, it is advisable to use HDMI and let the processor handle as much as possible.

2. Should be no difference between coax and optical.

Kal
Kr4....Yes, the player does decode the HD audio tracks.

I was referring to any and all surround modes currently available on Blu Ray and and standard def dvd's..including the hi-def surround modes.
OK. Then the issue of whether HDMI or 5.1 is "better" depends on whether you want to use the DSP/bass management in the processor. I believe that, with modern equipment, it is advisable to use HDMI and let the processor handle as much as possible.