2. cables
  3. 124327-158

Has anyone tried these stunning new CPT power cord?

   Considering the many, many brands of power cords I've tried in my very well accomplished high-end system, I have never been so impacted by these Core Power Technology power cords. Within a very short period(15-20) minutes my system literally came alive. Soundstage opened wider and deeper. The background became dead silent, space between instruments and stage members were more focused and everything sounded cleaner and musical than ever. My highs had a glorious crispness and symbols shimmered. Midrange through my 2" horn became more dynamic and punchy. My 15" bass driver tightened and dug low with great control. My Rel G1 which is a fabulous sub on its own but with a CPT 150 on it is another story. Running high pass from my sub to my Audiozen Noah amplifier, music depth is just stunning. Lower end bass is authoritative and clean with solid grip and impact. 
   My experience with these power cords is truly magical. The scary part of the above is I only have one 150 on my sub and one 300 from my wall to my 6 outlet bar. I still need 3 more to complete my system. I could just imagine the level after that...In closing, I cannot emphasize enough to try one of these in your system. I CANNOT and WIIL NOT take these out as they are that good. But hold your jaw, cuz what you've been listening to will just become real after Core Power Technologies. 

Cheers....and let the tapping begin.......



128x128bacardi
verafiaudio
695 posts
 
@calloway 

Thanks so very much for your efforts here. Easy to see that lots of time and care were taken and we are all in your debt. 

From my perspective glad each cable did well - and I expect that many of our owners will ALSO be owners of both the HF CT's or the CT GE. I already have heard from several owners of our products coupled to the SUPERB CT GE cords. Apparently there is a nice synergy there. The HF CT cords are also earning well-deserved praise everywhere and I look forward to being exposed further to them in the future. 

Right now - most of our customers are using E=C units with some sort of IEC "strip" and everyone seems quite happy with their results (and with their own cables plugged into their strip of choice). Some are using E=C directly plugged into their particular piece of gear where they are interested in what Balanced Power can do for them on an individual piece of gear. Either way is just fine with us of course. 

When our larger E=C 1200 and E=C 1800 units start to ship - I'm sure we will see a variety of Power Cords plugged into the back as these units have 8 Hubbell Outlets at the ready. 

Thanks again for the efforts and energy put into this test. 

Best wishes,

Mark

worldwidewholesales
133 posts
 
Hi Calloway;

Sounds like you do your testing exactly the same as my group of friends and myself. We are also going to be testing the HF cable (HF CT-1 Enhanced) against a CPT 300. I have had my CPT cables for a few months and they sound very different at 500 plus hours than they did at 50 hours. When we do our testing we will take the time to allow the HF cable a break in time of minimum 500 hours because we want to be totally accurate on our comparison.  Perhaps someone out there could tell me if 500 hours is long enough of a break in for HF power cables because I know that 500 hours is just where the CPT cords really open up and start to play the whole frequency range.

Cheers,


calloway
870 posts
 
www...it is a great cable and even at the early juncture of testing, as the one I have is a demo,and not burned in, and I have ordered a new one,  is ...IMO...better than the CT-1...500 hrs on a HF pc is probably well burned in.
lak's avatar
Ag insider logo xs@2x
lak
4,537 posts
 
Robert,
500 hours will easily break in the HF CT-1E power cord. I doubt if you would even need 500 hours, more like 350 hours, but for your testing purposes 500 hours would be a very fair comparison. My only suggestion would be to make sure once the power cord is in place, don’t move it or jostle it.
What compoient is the power cord going to power?

Hopefully you are aware that comparing HFC products to other products is very difficult and frustrating because of the lingering effects of magnetic conduction, and the slow restart up of magnetic conduction.
This forces the listener to rely upon their memory of the HFC verses a direct comparison A vs B vs C etc.

In other words after the HF CT-1E power cord is burned in, evaluate it.
Take the HF CT-1E out of the system for a week so that the magnetic conduction effect is gone (using a non HFC power cord during the interim period is fine as long as your not doing any evaluations) and then compare the other power cords.
In my opinion if you don’t do this your test results will not be accurate.

worldwidewholesales
133 posts
 
Thank you both for your suggestions and we will definitely use 500 hours as a minimum for the burn in time, just to be fair to both manufactures. We have also found that moving cables can have a negative effect and even unplugging a cable causes a difference in the soundstage. Our thoughts are to test the HF cable first and than plug in the CPT and wait 30 minutes before listening to the CPT cable. Ideally we like to let a cable settle for 24 hours but this would not be practical for this comparison.

In my system the CPT has a dramatic effect on my Lumin, so I will swap out cables on my Lumin.
More to discover