Is Maggie 20.1 still overall better than 3.7?

Hi Folks, is Maggie 20.1 (or even the older version, 20) still overall better than 3.7(i)?

Second question: are the 20.7s on a totally another level compared with 20.1s?

mtoc04-01-2016 4:02pm

...
23 posts total
View entire discussion

hasse Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 230 posts 04-04-2016 at 03:12pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete "Thanks, Hasse--do you use any of the tweaks I listed?" Hi Freeman, yes I´m using the Cardas mid and tweeter jumpers and I am tempted to try the Synergistic Red.
sbank Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 3,402 posts 04-04-2016 at 04:11pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Perhaps 3.7s mated with subs is the ticket? Recently heard 20.7 with REL subs, pretty great. Cheers, Spencer
don_c55 Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 1,025 posts 04-04-2016 at 08:19pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Subs NEVER mate perfectly with planars. The sonic transition from panel to cone is always heard IMO!
bdp24 Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 10,493 posts 04-05-2016 at 02:36am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete That's how I felt Don. So I bought a pair of Magneplanar Tympani T-IV's to use as (sub)woofers for my Quad 57's (I had a big room ;-). Then I got a pair of the OB/Dipole Subs from GR Research. Wanna buy a pair of Tympani IV's? I don't need 'em anymore!
sbank Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 3,402 posts 04-05-2016 at 05:20pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Don, I also used to agree w/your statement, but newer JL and REL subs have opened my eyes (ears?). Cheers, Spencer

23 posts total
View entire discussion

More to discover