Wash, Cut, Polish & Demagnetize


As I sat and read through the most recent threads on the "Agon" forum, I noticed a thread regarding "Glossary of Audio Myths". I noticed several comments regarding "greening" and demagnetizing CDs.

Without delving too deeply into the effects of laser light diffraction, deflection, dispersion and reflecting light from adjacent tracks creating "jitter", and to avoid reduntantly examining the fact that the aluminum "wafer" in a CD is not always just aluminum, but in many cases aluminum "alloy", I would like to attempt to dispel a few of these "myths".

Many CD manufacturing facilities use a coating of mold release agents on the manufacturing machinery and on the plastic substrate material in the actual CD to facilitate ease of handling throughout the manufacturing process. Somewhat similar to spraying a cooking pan with "PAM" to reduce sticking. The residual amounts remaining on the CD upon completion of manufacturing should be removed as it will cause minor deflection and loss of focus of the laser beam. Specialty chemicals are available specifically for this purpose. I wash the CDs thoroughly using Dawn dishwashing liquid and very warm water. I cannot confirm that this process is as effective as using the specialty chemicals, but it leaves the CD surface extremely clean and seemingly free from any "oily" feel.

I then cut the edge of the CD using an Audiodesk CD cutter. This process reduces the amount of laser scatter from exiting through the outer edge of the CD and flooding the inside of the CD transport with reflected laser light. By cutting a bevel on the edge of the CD, you actually reduce the edge surface area by which the diffracted laser light can disperse. Some may feel that this a bit excessive, but we must keep in mind that the results of these treatments are cumulative.

The next process involves applying CD "Green" to the beveled edge. The properties of the color value of the Green used in the majority of these coatings tend to absorb any stray laser light. I still, to this day, have not been able to figure out why Green is the color of choice although, I have been told that it is simply the values of each of these colors (Red laser light and Green) that work together in unison to "neutralize" the light. The initial washing of the CD also helps to enhance the adhesion of the green coatings.

Upon allowing the CD green to dry, I then apply CD diamond using 100% cotton balls, and polish using again, cotton balls. CD diamond is an optical enhancer similar to Optrix,
Vivid, etc. and also contains a anti-static component. Most of these "optical enhancers" work by simply filling in microscopic pores in the CD surface permitting a more direct transmission of the laser beam through the plastic substrate material to the actual CD surface.

The last step involves demagnetizing the CD using a Furutech RD-2 CD demagnetizer. CDs, contrary to what most people believe can and will become magnetized. The results are a less black background, a general "haze" and loss of detail. If Cds were made using pure aluminum with NO trace elements, this step might not be required.

The results of all this? Pretty damn amazing. Again, recognizing that the results of all of these steps are cumulative, when all is said and done, the improvement is quite significant. Although these steps may sound somewhat time consuming, each CD actually only takes about three minutes to complete.

I hope I have provided some insight as to "dispelling" some of these myths. I can, and will, stand by this process as time and time again these enhancements have made CDs a lot more listenable. And, I have dropped the jaws of many non-believers after they have heard the actual results.

Any comments regarding this process are welcome. Happy listening.


128x128buscis2

Showing 4 responses by sutts

Buscis- I tried the CD Lathe from a local dealer (he treated one disc as a test), and I believe I could detect an improvement, HOWEVER, here's the problem:

that disc now has BIG problems being tracked properly (especially track #1) on my transport, which has NO problems tracking ay other discs. Hmmmm..... I was THIS close to buying the lathe, but now I'm not so sure...
Sean- re: the CD Lathe, as I indicated earlier, I had a local dealer trim one ~ a year ago, and have bad tracking errors since on that disc. I was there a few months ago and again had him do another one, this time, an EXACT copy of the same Ella Fitzgerald disc I already have. So basically, I am willing to give it another shot with a true a/b test on MY (not the dealer's) system.

I have not as yet done the comparison of the 2 identical discs (trimmed vs untrimmed), as my system has been down for several months, however the new Sistrum stands will be here next week and my 'take no prisoners' Spectral trans/Audio Note dac digital setup will once again be activated. I will do the test and perhaps post a thread on it. I can tell you that I did hear a difference at the dealer's store though- enough to convince me to let him trim a couple of my own discs...
I have 2 Ella Fitzgerald discs that are completely identical (both from Decca, made the same year- everything the same). One has been Lathe-trimmed, one has not. Once i get my system back up (about another week), I am going to take the Pepsi challenge and post a result...
just did the Pepsi challenge (part 1)- Ella F trimed vs untrimmed. I think trimed was (very slightly) better, but too close to call at this point. Part 2 will come when the new preamp gets here- this temporary passive thingie I'm using isn't helping matters. More later...