Vandersteen 7 mark ll or big Kef blades

Yes Tomic we won’t claim to have designed any crossovers, we know what many people like and many people like Vandys and many people do not.

It is interesting for such a Vandy fan who proclaims to have three sets of them, not to always be mentioning  your Quads, or Stages or Cornwalls, the only loudspeakers you keep on pushing  religiously is Vandy remember your nice comment about any other non perfect piston loudspeaker being imperfect, and chasing our tails?  guess that goes for the 1C, 2CE, 3A, the Treo,  as they don't have perfectly pistonic drivers now do they? 

Don’t need to read the LS 50’s white paper we have them and we have heard them compared to many other good loudspeakers.

Tney are way more transparent then a set of Vandy 1Cs, add a good subwoofer and you are good to go.

Dave and Troy
Audio Doctor NJ

I have to add Doc that your persistence that long ago took a bounding leap crossing the line into obnoxiousness which in no way causes you to be chastened or embarrassed by unending criticism is in a very perverse way impressive.

Roxy it has nothing to do with us vs any other dealer. 


We talk facts. We talk about opinions. To say one speaker is better than another is silly.

Which is better a BMW or a Mercedes?

We point out why we believe our products are competitive and a good value and why we carry those companies.

These discussions get nasty when someone makes a silly comment about why only one type of loudspeaker design is correct. 

There are many valid loudspeaker designs which include time and phase aligned designs as well as non time and phase aligned designs.

You may prefer a Vandy that makes it better for that listener a guy who prefers a Wilson' a Magico Rockport or a Persona isnt wrong in there preference.

Lets agree on that.

Dave and Troy

Dave. We have been trying to tell you that one design is correct. It's Vandersteen.......:-)