Record Sleves


Hi - I have purchased Mofi Original record sleeves.

A couple of questions if I may, with some contetx:

1. Mofi has without question reduced the static electricity I have dealt with compared to other record sleves.

I have two issues: (1) the Mofi sleeves seem to have a lot of volume, meaning they take up a lot of space in the record album  (2) for the albums with with an insert or  sleeve with lyrics (or similar) how do you store that?

I think the Mofi sleeves are good - but they take up a lot of space - any suggestions?

 

ctlesq

The Sleeve City ultimate sleeves are cut a little tighter than MoFi and fit into the jackets a little better. If a MoFi is too big for the jacket, assuming you are using a plastic outer sleeve, you can just put the record behind the record jacket and put them both into the outer sleeve, or inside the record jacket if it opens like a book and then put the whole thing into the plastic outer sleeve. I’ve never had a problem doing this. 

I use the dual pocket sleeves from Vinyl Storage Solution. The outer sleeve is in one pocket on itself, never gets touched. The record and anything else (lyrics sheet, hype sticker, photos, posters, note cards) are in the second pocket. Same also for (double) albums. VSS also has oversized sleeves for those thick records, or those that were made a bit larger. 

VSS inner sleeves have no print on it, unlike the annoying mofi branding. This is a big selling point in favor of VSS, which also has two different thicknesses. 

@chayro thank you for responding - that is very helpful feedback.

@oberoniaomnia - wow, I had no idea something like that even existed.  I wonder what might be available for multi-record albums?  This is something that will address a number of my records, I will have to keep researching.  Thanks!

I bought and really liked Sleeve City products.

Have since moved to VSS a few years ago. They are both great products.

Always heard about the MA Recordings, inner sleeves. Supposedly breathable in addition to being anti static 

Another vote here for Sleeve City.  Been using their sleeves (both inner and outer) for many years.  I really like their outer sleeves, which easily fit single and most double LP albums without having to be "shoe horned" in. And they make more commodious sleeves for thicker items.  I really appreciate the company's attention to these small-but-very-important details.  

@ctlesq Here's the link to the album sleevesVSS link

For trifolds, I use a dual sleeve for two, then add a single sleeve and tape it together. Works well. For box-sets, depends a bit. Some have only inner sleeves in box, and the replacement inners still fit in box. If there are inners and outers in box, then the records are stored besides the box, and the box remains empty (sometimes with booklet, poster, etc.). With flimsy boxsets (e.g. the recent 4AD re-issue of X-mal Deutschland), I made an inner box from discarded archival mat board so that the box will not collapse. Then put the "box" in an oversized record sleeve, records on the side individually.

Without wanting to dampen enthusiasm, I would like to make a case for a different approach for taking care of your precious records.  First, let me relate how I was taught this lesson.  The late Mrs. Smith, owner and proprietor of my favorite record store, Standard Record & HiFi, on 65th Avenue NE, Seattle, cautioned me to be sure to remove the cellophane outer wrapper from all new records.  She explained that if I did not there was a risk that mildew would form on the vinyl over time that was quite harmful and could cause irreversible damage.  She advocated the use of premium inner sleeves only and those always inserted such that the opening would be up as the record is replaced in the jacket.  Records should be stored loosely, but upright on shelves out of sunlight in a cool dry room.  This advice was given to me in 1970.  In the intervening years I have collected thousands of records.  Last year I came into possession of an estate collection numbering approximately 8,000 albums.  All of these were stored in both inner and outer sleeves.  They were stored in an air conditioned facility in Miami.  A rough estimate is that approximately 30-40% of them have mildew damage.  So, re-read Mrs. Smith's advice, which I endorse.  Also, none of the thousand records that I have collected, but not stored in outer sleeves has ever developed mildew damage.  

@billstevenson I always read your comments and consider your knowledge and experience in these matters.  Thank you for sharing.  

@billstevenson Interesting observation. Mildew is tied to high humidity. I've been storing my records in outer sleeves at room temperature in Switzerland and California since the mid 80s. Not one case of mildew. Air conditioning in Florida may have contributed to the problem, as Florida in general has humid air, For archival storage one would also need to address the humidity issue, not just temperature. Removing water from the air is more complicated than adjusting temperature only. I very much doubt that the outer sleeves contributed significantly to mildew formation. The main culprit is humidity. I work on the board of a non-profit, which has a mold infested book collection in Florida. No sleeves, but high humidity, lots of mold.

@oberoniaomnia You are certainly correct that mildew comes from high humidity. Outer sleeves would be a barrier to air circulation and evaporation.  As you say this is a complex problem.  I am glad you have not had to deal with it.  I had not dealt with it either until the encounter mentioned in my previous post.  Each collector must assess for his or her self what actions to take to preserve their collection.  Sharing knowledge is always helpful in my opinion.  Use it or not, that is your prerogative.