I started with the Tympani 1D in 1977 with the Audio Research SP-4 preamp and D-100A amp - fantastic - had them for 25 years.
Then tried the 1.7s with Rel subs - very nice. Then the Larsen 9s. I just got the 2.7x - Wow!! What a difference - the 1.7s sounded veiled by comparison, and the Larsens didn’t have the soundstage I needed. I have a 25’x 30’ room with 13’ ceilings - they sound absolutely superb with the Lyngdorf TDAI-3400 amp. I considered the 3.7i, but wanted something newer. Highly recommend the 2.7x if you have the space and budget.
Newbie Maggie question: Best bang for buck?
I know I am destined to buy my first pair of Maggies soon. These will likely be my last “forever” speaker. So I want to get it right - one swing and a home run is what I need. Yet, I have more desires than I have money. Here’s (hear’s) my question:
In general (ahem, in general) as you go up and down the Maggie line, basically (ahem, basically) what changes is the size of the speakers and their drivers. Larger surface area = more moving air = bigger soundstage, etc.
BUT:
Other than size, what is the “sweet spot” in the Magnepan line from a technological / design perspective? In other words, where in the Maggie line can I get the most bang for my buck? Which speaker utilizes the best of Magnepan’s technological refinements, yet keeps the size and cost to a minimum?
Theoretically, if all Megnepans were the same size, which one would provide the best sound at the cheapest cost?
Thanks in advance for your sage like advice!

