2. speakers
  3. 1266045256

Dear Fellow SC IVA owners

Dear SC IVA owners. I recently made some improvements to my SC IVAs that were transforming when all were added up together. I thought I'd share these and hope others contribute to what improvements they have made. 1. Added Sunfire IV subwoofers set at the lowest crossover point and very very low volume. This improved midrange noticeably by opening it up while the bass went a bit deeper. Spread speakers out from each other nearer sides of room so at least 2.5 feet farther from each other with major improvement in detail and clarity. Added symposium ultra platforms under each speaker with Walker points under the platforms. Major improvement again. All of these transformed my sound from very good but slightly cloudy to very clear with even deeper and tighter bass, a scary musicality rare in any component and a top to bottom coherence that this speaker is known for. I hope someone else has had similar success and perhaps some other new tips. All of these improvements except the subwoofers came from suggestions from other Audiogon members.
jonathanhorwich

Showing 4 responses by unsound

unsound
7,311 posts
 
Pryso, if I'm not mistaken John Dunlavy did not recommend an equilateral triangle and the Dunlavy's aren't a true D'Appolito array.
unsound
7,311 posts
 
Pryso, perhaps the Duntech's have different instructions than the Dunlavy's. I've just double checked my copy of the Dunlavy instruction sheet and the guidelines for speaker setup suggest distances that are not quite equilateral as a starting point. A D'Appolito array is indeed a MTM array, but all MTM arrays are not D'Appolito arrays. D'Appolito arrays require specific distances between those drivers and a very different cross-over than those used by John Dunlavy. I too had the good fortune to speak with John Dunlavy a few times and one time at some length. The audiophile community suffered a great loss with his passing. Please let me congratulate you on your excellent choice in speakers.
unsound
7,311 posts
 
Pryso, the Dunlavy's also have stepped baffles, in order to maintain proper time alignment.
unsound
7,311 posts
 
Pryso, I could be mistaken about some of the details, but, John Dunlavy might have made some prototypes(?) of a statement speaker (Magnumns?) that had active digital cross-overs and separate digital amps for each driver in a rather oddly shaped cabinet that appeared to look like 2 triangles mounted upon each other at a single corners that had flat baffles. The digital cross-overs were to electronically correct for the timing issues of the various voice coil depths. Apparently this avoided the cupped horn loading problems of the stepped baffles. I think John Dunlavy was waiting for higher resolution digital devices to become more of a marketable item to make the speakers more reasonably priced. John told me that this was the future of his designs, and he hoped that as the digital technology developed, it could be trickled down to his less expensive products. He believed that the digital technology could cut the costs of the then necessary labor needed to hand match each set of speakers. Unfortunately, poor health took over before he and us could realize the promise of his brilliant ambition.
More to discover