Anyone heard the difference between Cullen Crossover and his new Crossover II?

While I have not compared the Crossover with the Crossover ll; I do have two Cossover lls in my system. One on my power conditioner and one on my amp.

I'm very happy with their performance. I thought I would try them and then see where I would go from there. They've worked so well that they are an end-game for me.

The Crossover ll uses the rhodium plated carbon fiber/stainless plug. I've found in my system those plugs are refined, neutral, with great tone/timbre and detail. If you go for the Crossover I would have Patrick put the rhodium/carbon fiber plugs on it.

Cullen make fantastic cables. I moved to all Cullen Cables in my system about a year ago and have been completely satisfied. 

Give ve them a try. I think you'll be very pleased.

Cheers,

Scott

I know this is an old thread, but I came across it when I had the exact same question. I would be using it for either my BAT VK-75se or my PS Audio Dectet. 

When I emailed Patrick at Cullen, he said the Crossover II would "...throw a slightly larger soundstage and background instruments come to life slightly more." But for the BAT, the Crossover would "more than suffice."

Sounded good to me since the Crossover II is almost double in price. I was going back and forth between the Crossover and the Acoustic Zen Tsunami, but went with the Crossover. Unfortunately for me/Fortunately for Patrick, he is very busy right now, so it will be 2-3 weeks before he gets it out. Looking forward to it tho'.

I also like Morrow cables very much, but I've never tried their power cords.

Have you tried the audio envy power cords? 

Crossover 2 better bass more open jump on it ASAP!!