Current optimized or voltage optimized speakers?


Just read a recent post from an old thread, and an old question, that has kicked around the Forum for some time. Back in "09," a member wrote:

"Read Atmasphere's posts and white paper. Amp choice [is] highly dependent on whether your speakers are current optimized or voltage optimized. Which strongly suggest[s] that at least a part of 'system synergy' can be predicted."

The question for the Forum is how can one know whether speakers are "current optimized or voltage optimized"?

My layman's understanding of Ralph's whitepaper is that most solid state amps are based on the "voltage paradigm" (voltage is constant and watts change with load) and that most tube amps are based on the "power paradigm" (voltage changes with load, but watts don't change very much) [or is it the other way around?? LOL]

The old post quoted above suggests that some speakers will work better with solid state amps and others with tube amps -- let's leave electrostats and maggies out of the discussion. I'm thinking about the vast array of dynamic speakers out there.

So . . . restating the question, how do we know whether dynamic Speaker X will work best with a tube amp or a solid state amp?
bifwynne
Couldn't have said it better than Michael (Swampwalker) did, except that in the last sentence change "wattage" to "voltage."

Also, although it doesn't directly relate to the question, it's worth mentioning that Ralph (Atmasphere) has also stated that solid state amps, as well as tube amps, will generally perform better into high impedances than low impedances. This assumes, of course, that they are not asked to approach the limits of their power capability when doing so.

One final point, although it is a fairly obvious one. Researching what amplifiers others use with a given speaker can often be helpful in determining whether to go tube or solid state.

Best regards,
-- Al
Impedance phase angles which are severely negative (i.e., capacitive), especially at frequencies where the magnitude of the impedance is low, will make life difficult for the amplifier in terms of how much current it has to supply. Also, the efficiency of the speaker will most likely be less than it would be if the phase angles were more benign, everything else being equal. That will further increase the power demands on the amplifier.

I don't think, though, that highly capacitive phase angles in themselves are necessarily an indication that a suitably high powered tube amp would not be sonically compatible. Although, of course, high quality high powered tube amplification does not come cheaply.

Best regards,
-- Al
Phase angle has nothing to do with whether the speaker is Voltage or Power Paradigm.

I am always amused by the idea that 'this speaker is hard to drive so get a transistor amp that can double down.' The speaker got the reputation of being 'hard to drive' for a reason; you can count on the fact that a hard to drive speaker will never sound right with any amp, as the amp has to work hard to drive it (equals more distortion, which contributes to harshness).

The simple answer to the OP is look at the designer's intention. For example Coincident Technology uses tube amps for reference- Power Paradigm technology.

Planar speakers of all types tend to be Power Paradigm also. I know these weren't to be in the conversation per the OP, but there it is. Planars don't have an impedance curve based on box resonance, and it is resonance that drives the impetus for the Voltage Paradigm.

An example is a box resonance due to a woofer in the box. When an amplifier that is a voltage source encounters the box resonance (impedance peak) it throttles back its power. This gets flat frequency response in theory.

But just because you have box resonance does not mean the speaker is on the Voltage Paradigm. An example of Power Paradigm box speakers was already mentioned, another is Audiokinesis, where Duke has built speakers that take advantage of the amplifier's power response in a way that allows the speaker an extra 1/2 octave of response in the bottom octave, without coloration. There are many other examples.
Ralph, Al and others -- thanks for your responses, but I'm still not sure the question has been answered.

As I said, my speakers -- Paradigm S-8 v3's -- have some pretty wild impedance and phase angle curves. At one point (100Hz I think), impedance is as low as 4 ohms. But above and below that point, it's roller coaster land. Phase angles are weird too. Nevertheless, the speakers are nominally rated at 8 ohms. How Paradigm came up with that number, I'll never know.

Al, you're pretty good at finding equipment specs on line. If you can find the Paradigm S-8 specs, you'll see what I mean.

I drive my S-8s with an ARC VS-115 tube amp -- output is 120+ wpc. To my untrained ears, bass slam is great, overall sound is smooth, imaging very good, and so forth and so on. And I know bass is great because my wife is always complaining about the house shaking.

I guess I'm just lucky with my dumb choices, dunno. But if I was starting from scratch and already owned the VS-115, should I have looked to match my amp with a different type of speaker; and vice versa, if I already owned the S-8s, should I have looked to match the speakers with a different type of amp.

I think that's the bottom line Q here. How does one make an informed decision?

P.S. Ralph, you mentioned that "[w]hen an amplifier that is a voltage source encounters the box resonance (impedance peak) it throttles back its power. This gets flat frequency response in theory." Ok, flip the facts, if you got a speaker with an impedance peak, I believe a Power Paradigm amp (tube) will put out the same wattage regardless of impedance peaks. Would that result in frequency response NOT being flat with a tube amp.

Sorry for my persistence. I'm just trying to get this concept down. And if I am confused, I bet other are too!

Thanks guys. I think your responses will help the rest of us ding-dongs be better buyers.