Do we believe in Machina Dynamics?

Pauly, I don't want to go through this once again with you. I was a physics major, among other majors, in the 1960s. Physics today is quite different than then. I read Scientific American and have several friends in the Physics department. In reality, I doubt very much that you have any understanding of physics or the limitations on our knowledge of natural phenomena.

If something that fails to be explained by our limited knowledge, it is a challenge to our theories and understanding. Rejection of an observation that is contrary to a theory is a challenge to the theory and not to be dismissed as an accident or to be swept under the carpet and ignored.

You, my dear sir, are a pseudo-scientist.

Regards,

Norm

+++ I was a physics major, among other majors, in the 1960s +++

Good for you Norm, you have a bachelors degree. My secretary has an MBA.

+++ In reality, I doubt very much that you have any understanding of physics or the limitations on our knowledge of natural phenomena. +++

Yep, and Geoff K is so way ahead of me, I just don’t know what I am missing?

+++ Rejection of an observation +++

I have yet to reject the findings of observation even once in my life.

Two weeks I tested a SS, wooden and plastic outlet cover plates back to back. Observation = zero difference.

So far from being swept under the carpet, the so-called cover plate tweak is nothing other than crap.

+++ You, my dear sir, are a pseudo-scientist. +++

LOL, coming from somebody that spends $1K on holograms and supports Machina Dynamics, you must forgive me for not taking that comment seriously.

There’s an old saying Norm, a fool and his money is easily parted. Old Geoff parts you with your money with little trouble.

Regards
Paul

Paully, so once again I am right you haven't a clue about physical regularities or of the scientific methods. Please spare us your trite phrases and unscientifically based judgment without fact.

Wow, somebody that says {and I quote verbatim} “I am untroubled by not knowing how it works” is lecturing me on scientific method.

+++ Please spare us your trite phrases and unscientifically based judgment without fact +++

LOL, without fact you say Norm? Pray tell me, what “facts” do you have? The ones you don’t know about?

I am still waiting to hear whether you know why power cables can improve sound. But I guess that is just one of the “facts” that you don’t have, isn’t it. I understand now why we have folks like Kait around … the temptation to fleece folks like you must be difficult to resist.

Regards
Paul

So, Pauly, you will castigate me for saying when it comes to audio buying decisions that I don't care how it works, and then for not having scientific "facts?" Damned if I do, and damned if I don't!

I have no obligation to provide you with what you call "facts" in your untrained lexicon of the scientific method.

I am sure you feel confident that you are immune from con-artists despite your ignorance of science. LOL!