2. amps-preamps
  3. 1172602573

Audio Research Cheap as Dirt?

As my beloved ARC SP-11 MK II continues to fetch big bucks on the used market, I was a bit surprised to see the low prices for later model line stage preamps.

It never occured to me to buy a solid state ARC product, but perhaps the LS3 is worth a listen for a spare preamp? Or video or desktop system?

If nothing else, it would be nice to have the same ergonomics and build quality as I have in my main system.

In the < $1000 range for systems where I will not need a phono stage, what is the hierarchy of bargains in ARC preamps?
cwlondon
aball
2,016 posts
 
The LS3 is inexpensive but I owned one and wouldn't recommend it at all. Its sound is flat, timbre is monochromatic, dynamics are compressed, bass is weak and highs are grainy. It ranks as the worst preamp I have ever tried (and I've had a dozen). For barely more money, the Classe CP50 was far and away more sophisticated and accomplished. Such was my experience.

Arthur
cwlondon OP
1,210 posts
 
Arthur

Thank you. I just got off the phone with Leonard at ARC.

In my experience over the years, he has always been a pretty straight shooter, but he described the LS3 as "a nice preamp". Then again, I suppose ARC pays his bills.

He did, however, detect that I like tubes, and for "tubeiness" pointed out that the LS7, 8, 5, 15, and in particular LS 22 would be "tubeier."

Also, that the LS1 is basically an SP-9 without the phono stage?

Dont know if any of these approach the bargain prices of the LS3?
driver's avatar
driver
750 posts
 
Had an LS-9 & it was a good sounding unit-it would be my pick.

If I were looking for an "inexpensive" preamp, I would get an Acurus LS or RS-11.
More to discover