Price Increases


As of late (within last 12 months), I've noticed substantial
price increases by some well known names (Speaker) in the industry on their entire product lines. With no updates to design I cannot understand why the price hikes. I'm not saying the increases are not necessary from a business standpoint or whatever reason, but it discourages me cause it puts many of these products out reach for so many hobbyist including myself. It does make the used market so attractive. Just venting.
demar
labor, shipping, tape, wood crates, boxes, drivers, caps inductors, screws, finishes..... 100% of everything used has gone up a in price and some things have doubled in 2 years. A few a the big "fine" makers are 100% produced in China now I finally get it!

Decent car 30K

Fine loudspeaker 30K

Fine Chinese loudspeaker 15K
David ... the "directionality" of your figures appears reasonable. To put an even finer point on your comment, let's add variable and fixed costs, such as R&D, QC and "S,G, & A" overhead. I made a similar point in other threads about manufacturing economics.

For example, I surmise that large manufacturing companies like Focal, Revel and Paradigm incur roughly similar amounts of fully loaded speaker production costs on a per unit basis. These companies have large volume operations, do their own R&D and manufacture many speaker components in house, most notably the drivers.

It is no coincidence that the three companies also use beryllium dome tweeters in their high end speaker lines. I understand that these companies manufacture their drivers in house.

I don't know how much it costs Wilson to make its speakers on a full absorption cost basis. I realize that the speaker enclosures are made of some secret formula materials, which may be expensive. But ... I surmise that because Wilson doesn't do the volume that a Focal, Revel or Paradigm does, its per unit full absorption cost to make a Wilson speaker is higher than a Focal, Revel or Paradigm speaker -- and that doesn't even speak to the quantum of gross profit that Wilson has to make if it has less volume.

I have no support for the next point which I heard from a Paradigm dealer, who in turn heard this from a Paradigm regional sales rep. So take this with a grain of salt. The story was that a speaker like the Paradigm Signature 8 would have to retail for $30,000 if manufactured by a smaller company for all of the reasons mentioned above. Is the $30,000 number a hard figure. Probably not. But the take-a-way is that because Paradigm is a large volume company, it would be a challenge for a small manufacturer to match Paradigm's MSRP of $9,000 for the Sig. 8.

As to price increases, the point of this thread, it is no coincidence that the US dollar has decreased in value compared to the Euro and the Canadian dollar. In the case of the Paradigm Sig 8, the MSRP was about $5500/pair when the S8s were first introduced sometime in 2004 or so. At that time, the Canadian dollar was worth about 70 cents US. The current exchange rate is about one-to-one. Just based on f/x considerations alone, the MSRP increased by almost 50-percent!! And that doesn't even speak to inflation or the cost of R&D design improvements.

Happy Holidays,

Bruce
Of course you are right Johnk, but I think the concern here is the 50-100% or more increase in cost of flagship models from numerous lines.
Why is a concern? Companies can raise or drop prices WITH or WITHOUT changes to a product. All market driven where demand can support a higher or lower price.
A) Something's worth whatever the buyer pays for it.

B) Always factor in the number of live performances you could see and subsequent memories you would make for what you'd spend on Amy component.
A) Something's worth whatever the buyer pays for it.
Yep! Unless you have manipulation or price fixing by governments.

Apparently not enough demand for LSA integrated amps so selling direct and slashing price?

VAC is jacking up prices without changes probably due to higher demand? Demand supports higher prices?