Your Preference: Resolution or Fullness?


Just saw this mentioned over at another forum and thought it'd be good to hear your thoughts. Do you place a bigger importance on a speaker's resolution or its overall fullness of sound? This can apply to any type of speaker model, whether it bookshelf/tower, etc.
mkash3
You can have both with SoundLab electrostatic panels when properly set up with quality electronics.
I think this http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/sound/timbre.html might clear up some of the misunderstandings. It's what our ears perceive as natural that allows us to enjoy the moment and all of is somewhat tied together.

All the best,
Nonoise
Al, of course, my oversight; sorry. Thanks for clarifying and for your fine post; as usual.
Tubegroover, wow, thanks for the nice words. Funny, I always feel very inadequate in that regard, there is so much depth to the subjects of music and sound that we only scratch the surface. Regards.
I think I saw neutrality only pop up on one post, but naturalness showed up on that same post and a few others. I believe naturalness addresses the timbre and tonality mentioned and, is for me too, very important. Neutrality, in my mind, is unabtainable (as a true musical reproduction). All equipment is on one side or the other of absolute neutral. Definition (which includes some soundstage depth) and fullness are the side where I lean. At my age, resolution, transparency, air and the like are things I HAVE to listen for rather than simply enjoy.