2. speakers
  3. 1114113336

Poor Man's "Super-Speaker" System

Greetings, thought I'd post some impressions of the experiment I conducted with my main speakers. I had pair of Eminent Technology LFT-8's. Fabulous, economical speaker. I'd say a forerunner in the cost/performance race at a price of well under $2k.
I had read a review of them in which reviewer tried adding a second pair. He likened the sound to the Infinity RSV speakers sytem (at $60,000 in the 80's). That got my attention. So, I did it, bought the second set of speakers and am running them in parallel (the tweeter drivers are center of each pair, surrounded by the midrange, to tighten up the high end).

My system:
Rega Planet 2000 cd
Rogue Magnum 66 pre (configured with tape output internally switched to second pair of line outs)
Audioquest RCA "Y" adapters
Four pair Harmonic Technology interconnects, running into
8 channels of Outlaw Audio amps (Outlaw 755 at 200wpc feeding mid/highs on all speakers, and Outlaw 750 at 165wpc feeding lows on all speakers)
Of course, the four Eminent Tech LFT-8's
2 Vandersteen 2W subs

I have the higher wattage amp feeding mid/highs because it improved the clairity of the soundstage, and I can supplement the lows witht the Vandersteen subs.

Impressions:
POWER! Effortless bass- along with the twin Vandersteen subs, I now am running ten 8" bass drivers. No sweat with any low bass etc.

More 3/D or "holographic" sounding. With the wider sound stage and power one perceives a more live sound. Cymbals seem to be easier to hear decaying, the tiniest taps are audible clearly. Subtle nuances shifting from left to right speaker etc. are easier to catch.

Rock Music ROCKS! It's like a live concert! Thunderous bass, the voice sounds like you're listening to the monitors and you can visualize the guy at the mic...

There is no fatigue from the high end; I used to have Mangepan 1.6QR's and after while listening with the volume up,I'd have to turn it down, just so much shrillness my ears can take. The Eminents are much more forgiving to the ears, and doubling them does not wreck that quality.

There is still a "gravity" even at low listening levels. It sounds full and the detail remains even when playing softly.

Watched the clip from Gone in 60 seconds where Nick Cage gets reacquainted with "Elanore". WOA! Overwhelming presence in movies...

To purists, this may not be the way to go. At times I think I can hear slight nuances of two signals being reproduced, but when I hear a solo instrument, or voice, it sounds dead on like one speaker.

Shortcomings in my equipment may be partly to blame; one set of speaker cables is two foot longer than the other and only 11awg vs. shorter ones being 9awg.
One pair of speakers is about ten years older, the other recently built.
The Outlaw amps are not identical.
The interconnects are all same brand but not same model.
Only one set of speakers on "Sound Anchor" stands - the second set of stands is on the way.
The listening room is obviously small for such an attempt.
It is likely more room tuning is needed (I'm using four Auralex propannels behind the speakers in the corners).
I have not used "set up" discs or analysis to tune the system.


If such limitations due to budget were overcome/corrected, this setup might move from being exciting to being astounding.

I'm going to have some audiophile friends with better ears than me come and give their impressions. I may post them on my virtual system.

I know one thing, I will probably always biamp now that I have tried it. Likewise, would be hard to give up the ultra wide sound stage and visceral presence of the twin speakers now that I've got it. Bigger is definitely better in some respects. I can certainly see how huge speakers with vast arrays of drivers are very enticing. I'm trying to simulate the same experience with a modest outlay greenbacks.

As I said before, this project may not be the straightest line to a flawless signal/listening experience, but if nothing else, I'm getting a ton of fun from the project. I am enjoying attempting to create the poor man's "super-speaker."

Anyone else do anything this crazy?
douglas_schroeder
sedona
144 posts
 
Doug,

Thanks for sharing your thoughts - two pairs of the ET's with Vandy subs would be an ideal setup. I have to believe the ET's also sound incredible with movies. Congratulations on a great setup - and you did it all for under 2K!!
steuspeed's avatar
steuspeed
501 posts
 
Interesting idea. Similar to the flipped and stacked Quad's and Dahlquist DQ-10's of old. Sounds like a tweekers dream. Have fun.
plato
1,543 posts
 
Way back in the day I set up a crazy system that used Acoustat 1+1 electrostatic speakers flanked by Maggie MG-1 Improved speakers for bass.

The system was biamped and used a custom-built electronic crossover. I had a nice tube preamp feeding a Hafler DH-500 on the slim, 8-ft tall Acoustats; and a highly-modified Dynaco Stereo 70 feeding the bass panels of the MG-1's.

I'll tell you what, the system threw a huge soundstage and really rocked. Even though it was fairly ridiculous and almost defied logic, it was one of the most memorable and fun systems I ever threw together. And of course, back then, vinyl was THE premium-quality playback medium. As I recall, it was an AR ES-1 tt, with a Sumiko MMT arm and a Monster Alpha-1 MC cartridge. :)
douglas_schroeder OP
3,281 posts
 
Thanks a lot for responses; it IS a tweaker's delight! Who else has a story to tell about multi-speaker-madness?
sean
6,231 posts
 
If you like to rock or simply enjoy a very dynamic, low distortion presentation, increased headroom in both the speaker system and amplifiers is ALWAYS beneficial. From what i can recall, i've been preaching this idea for several years now. Glad you like it and hope it only gets better with time : ) Sean
>

PS... If you're a "rocker" on a budget and don't mind buying older used gear ( you're already on Audiogon, right??? ), two Klipsch Heresy's per side with four large home-brewed sealed and stuffed subwoofer drivers per side is a hard combo to beat. Very punchy mid-bass, solid vocals, plenty of bite in the guitars, pronounced cymbals with an extremely fast and tight bottom end that exhibits plenty of oomph, etc... If you can buy the raw woofers and build the cabinets yourself, the four Heresy's and sub system should run you about $1000 - $1200 at mosst.

Two NAD 2600's for the Heresy's and a beefed up Phase Linear 700B for the bottom end will get you over a kilowatt of power per side for around $1000. At appr 98 dB's of sensitivity for the dual Heresy's, the system will rock quite well without putting a massive strain on any of the amps. The slightly "mellow" NAD sound works pretty well to tame the potentially glaring horn sound of the Klipsch in stock form. The fact that all these amps have variable input level adjustments allows you to fine tune the balance between the Heresy's and the subs without the need for an active crossover. That is, if you want to keep the cost down and run passive subs.

Having said that, an active crossover will sound better and improve the performance on both the subs and Heresy's if you can swing it. Use the sharpest slope possible and keep the crossover point at around 40 - 50 Hz or so. Going higher in frequency will increase the bass weight of the system and potential dynamic range of the mains, but as you go higher and roll more of the bass out of Heresy's, you may notice that the kick drums will lose some of their "snap". This all boils down to personal preference here.

Personally, i prefer the Heresy's to La Scala's in stock form for most any type of music. They may not be as efficient, but they sound much more natural. The La Scala's require a LOT of work to really make them sing and most people aren't up to the tasks required. Besides that, the two Heresy's will cost less than one pair of La Scala's and take up less floor space / aren't nearly as ugly.
More to discover