Sony XAE777 CDP or Bel Canto DAC?

I've listened to them both, and the Bel Canto DAC is no match for even a stock SCD-XA777ES. The Philips player is amazing for the price. A few hundred in mods could probably elevate it to near the XA-777ES. You could upgrade your cables with the savings.

I own the Bel Canto DAC 2, and it is a highly-refined and detailed DAC. I do not have direct experience with the Sony, but from comments read on A'gon, the general consensus is that it is an OK, but not outstanding redbook player. So, I think many would disagree with Thsalmon's assessment of both pieces.

I really want a GREAT redbook player with solid SACD performance, what are some other choices.

You can get a Modded Art DIO or Scott Nixon DAC and then get a used CDP that can be used as a transport. I still use an old Phillips CD-80 CDP as a transport and am reluctant to give it up.I have even had offers for it if I were ever to sell it.

Do not use a DVD as a transport unless someone knows something I have not been told. I have been told they are not up to the performance of CDP's when used as a transport.

I have a Bolder Modified ART DAC with different power supply than the stock version. Now I think I would like to try the SN DAC,but i am going to try a Panisonic Digital Receiver and will be doing an A\B to see what kind of performance I can get using the internal DAC of the reciever instead of the ART before I decide on selling it.

There are threads at Audio Circle concerning shootouts of particular lowcost DACs which might intrest you. I would read them. Also checkout Harmonic Discord as there is relevant info there.

There is no sense in my estimation to buy a CDP for it's DAC. They are a changing almost every month and you can tailor the sound of your system to find the best combo for your taste and synergy with your particular equiptment. Plus I think you get better performance by choosing seperates.

Good luck!