BAT VK-5i or VK30 ??


Hi folks!
Anybody who might have had compare them and would care to
express an opinion on this topic...I'm looking for richness and fullness in low midrange and I understood that both offers it in spades.
Should the cut in tube # and features from 5i to 30 be regarded as economy or technological advance from BAT?
Also, what would be a good price to pay for these models?
Million thanks!
jstones
Victor Khomenko himself said the differences are minor at best. I have listened to both. the Vk30 is the better piece, simply from a user interface standpoint. Also, more updateable and a new piece too. Cheaper to retube as well. Check the Audio Asylum (www.audioasylum.com) for more info, search the archives.
I auditioned both the VK 5i and the VK 30 and went with the 30. However, both are excellent. The VK-30 is more versatile in that it can use either balanced or single ended connections, where the 5i is only balanced. The user interface is awesome. You can tailor the parameters of every input (balance, phase, volume, etc.) individually or globally. And the remote is outstanding. I've loved it for the last 2 years with no regrets, and the sound with the VK-200 and Aerial 10Ts is incredible.
Oops, forgot to add another piece of information for anyone considering the VK-30 versus 5i issue. The new VK-30 can accept the $500 onboard BAT phono card, where the 5i can not. This means you can have a one-box solution which includes phono as well as line level inputs. If you go with the 5i, you have to have a separate piece for phono, such the Lehmann Black Cube, or BAT's own VK-P5 or P10.
Good point on the phono card. However, I demo'd the VK30 with card vs. my 5i and P5 and the 5i/P5 just blew the doors off the internal VK30 card for phono. Add to that the 5i's greater sense of space and smoothness and I believer the 5i/P5 is a clear winner. That said, I have since upgraded to the VK50SE and only have praise for it.