DTC, thanks for the good response, with which I am in essential agreement.
I would just like to make sure it is clear to everyone that under my hypothesis cpu utilization which is low but non-zero may actually be WORSE with respect to noise generation than, for instance, 100% utilization would be. The noise transients I am envisioning are associated with the abrupt SWITCHING of cpu clock rate, and in some cases voltage as well, that unless disabled by the user will occur as processing tasks intermittently start and stop.
That switching involves LARGE changes in cpu current draw, which happen quickly, although I don't know exactly how quickly. Current changes that are both large and fast = large noise transients.
For those who may be interested, utilities such as the Windows-based program CPU-Z allow those changes in clock rate and voltage to be observed as they happen. It should be kept in mind that cpu current draw is highly dependent on clock rate.
Happy Thanksgiving to you and yours!
Best regards,
-- Al
I would just like to make sure it is clear to everyone that under my hypothesis cpu utilization which is low but non-zero may actually be WORSE with respect to noise generation than, for instance, 100% utilization would be. The noise transients I am envisioning are associated with the abrupt SWITCHING of cpu clock rate, and in some cases voltage as well, that unless disabled by the user will occur as processing tasks intermittently start and stop.
That switching involves LARGE changes in cpu current draw, which happen quickly, although I don't know exactly how quickly. Current changes that are both large and fast = large noise transients.
For those who may be interested, utilities such as the Windows-based program CPU-Z allow those changes in clock rate and voltage to be observed as they happen. It should be kept in mind that cpu current draw is highly dependent on clock rate.
Happy Thanksgiving to you and yours!
Best regards,
-- Al