2. analog
  3. 1300603793

Vinyl lovers I must be crazy

I have been in the hobby for about 40 years and it seems that I enjoyed my simple system back in the 70's more than my high end system of today. My old system consisted of a receiver (sherwood, marantz) a basic turntable (later upgraded ro a B&O) and various speakers. My current system the cables cost 5 times the entire 70's system and the rest of the gear is top notch. I am not saying the 1970's system was better but I think I enjoyed it much better than today's system. The 70's system was a all vinyl system and my current system I strictly listen to Cd's. Is that the problem listening to CD's? For you vinyl lovers what do you think? For those that made the switch back to playing records are you listening more now? Enjoying your system more? What type of vinyl dollar outlay did it cost to reach vinyl nirvana?

Any feedback would be appreicated. Thanks!
bobheinatz
bobheinatz OP
712 posts
 
Morgenholz,

I enjoyed reading your response. I also did own a Tandberg receiver back on the 80's and it was real nice. Progress is nice but sometimes I crave for simplier times like the 70's.
morgenholz
61 posts
 
Bobheinatz, I have bought two "modern" systems in the past few years: a Quicksilver Line/Phono/Mini Mites and a Primaluna ProLogue Three/Sevens. Both have on/off switches, input selector, and volume knob. No remotes. Manufacturers can keep their feature creep.
orpheus10
8,668 posts
 
Csgreene, I'm glad you said it and not me.
macdadtexas
1,794 posts
 
I don't get many, if any, pops and clicks on my vinyl. The table does have to be set up correctly, and the records clean, but, then you don't get the digital glare that you do from CD's that have only a fraction of the information that the vinyl does.

No "sample rate" on vinyl. If it was an analog recording, you get it all, and if it was a digital recording, you get more of it than the 44.1 sample rate of CD. HiRez files can get pretty darn close through a good DAC, or a very good SACD. Otherwise, no contest.
casperd's avatar
casperd
37 posts
 
My hearing is not as good now. That might be part of the problem. Also nostalgia is always deceptive. Digital is an approximation. Ones and zeros are always ones and zeros. A digital signal is never going to be a musical wave. Analog is the closest thing to the event. Digital is so dry and clinical due to this "faked" approximation. That contributes to listener fatigue. Digital is just boring. Even an investment of 700 dollars in a good used table and new cartridge will most likely surprise you.
More to discover