a copy cannot be better than the original in a technical sense. It is just not possible.
That does not mean a copy cannot sound subjectively better however. That is more a function of what one likes to hear.
Copying often has a filtering effect on teh original meaning that some aspects of the signal are altered relative to otehrs which changes the sound.
The bad thing is that information lost in copying cannot be replaced should your preferences change in the future.
Better perhaps to find other ways of tweaking to achieve the desired results that can be reversed or eliminated dynamically if desired? Different ICs, tone controls, speaker toe-in, etc. are all examples of reversible tweaks that might have similar effect without risk of permanent loss or damage to the source.
I suppose you could keep multiple copies of recordings around but there is still a lot of time and expense involved in dubbing recordings to achieve sound improvements versus other options perhaps?
That does not mean a copy cannot sound subjectively better however. That is more a function of what one likes to hear.
Copying often has a filtering effect on teh original meaning that some aspects of the signal are altered relative to otehrs which changes the sound.
The bad thing is that information lost in copying cannot be replaced should your preferences change in the future.
Better perhaps to find other ways of tweaking to achieve the desired results that can be reversed or eliminated dynamically if desired? Different ICs, tone controls, speaker toe-in, etc. are all examples of reversible tweaks that might have similar effect without risk of permanent loss or damage to the source.
I suppose you could keep multiple copies of recordings around but there is still a lot of time and expense involved in dubbing recordings to achieve sound improvements versus other options perhaps?