Technics EPA-500 users

I've had one a long time, and prefer it without the gasket.

I always found, with this arm, it depended on the armboard material. If the armboard was metal, I used the gasket. If the armboard was wood or acrylic, I didn't use the gasket. Just a personal preference, but it sounded better this way.

Thanks guy's,yes no "easy" way to adjust azimuth with this arm is the only thing I don't like about it,but the upside there is one less thing to tinker with.The headshell can be adjusted,although fine tuning it is a major pain.I removed the headshell on my one 501H armwand to rewire it.Just loosened the two allen screws and heated it with a hairdryer to loosen the glue.It was a major pain(for me anyway)to get the headshell realigned correctly after I removed it.

The 500 isn't alone in this reguard. Some very pricey and highly reguarded arms don't allow for azimuth adjustment(Grandeeza, SME 512s). I think the flexibility of the system will make up for this potential shortcoming. With a base installed on each table, cartridges can be rotated even between tables relatively quickly and easily since the arms all have the same effective length and overhang. Even the EPA 250 should be an option(if one ever comes up for sale). I don't think any modern tonearm has quite this level of flexibility.