"Any compliance sounds smeared and soft"
Lest the good folks misinterpret your comment, I'll embellish a bit.
The improvements rendered by reducing compliance result in both cleaner and more extended highs. There is nothing agressive sounding about the extended top end when you get this right.
Furthermore, the improvements are experienced as a richer, harmonic texture in instruments like acoustic bass. Bass texture is, after all about the upper frequency harmonics.
Again, it may well be that on some rigs, that isolating the motor can help in the way that a compliant belt can. Before you accuse me of heresy, hear me out.
In some AC motor experiments our little group of crazies has been undertaking, we positied that some of these drive systems might best be implemented with a compliant belt. There was too much vibration in the system.
Of course, we were looking at optimizing something that none of us would consider swapping out our rigs for, but the point is about trying to optmize given architecture.
There are no hard and fast rules. This was the source of my "ecosystem" comment and is the reason I'm not absolutist about one piece top shelves for the entire population of turntables.
I'm working on a source for some very stiff "L-brackets" which I used to source at an aluminum recycling yard. When I get the name for them, I'll publish it on both the shelf and stands FAQ section of my website as well as on the accessory page showing the sandbox made by Timber Nation.
Now, if you hang out at any electronic surplus houses, you might find some big honkin' heat sinks. I've come across some which are 6" x 8" and have some under my main sandbox.
Cheers,
Thom @ Galibier