Subwoofers - crazy upgrade!

By using the 1/4, 3/4 type of placement, you also eliminate the issues at 1/8th, 3/8th, 5/8th, 7/8th positions --> harman virtual sub principle

For the height dimension, raising a sub to the 1/4 height, 2 feet up is easy to do. For a 3/4th heightwise lift, room to start to look like a lab if you have it sitting on a 6 foot stand (in this example). Might be cleaner to do in-wall, in-ceiling, etc.

Eitherway, you see why a room with longer dimensions is a easy fix for the strong modes with subs (long dimensions = strong modes get pushed down into the sub range). In a small room, where these modes bump above 100 to 120 hz, i.e., above the sub range, there is no other choice, but thick diaphragmatic absorption, etc  to treat it --> which further eats away into a already small room. Further, the modes are packed closer together in a small room and its not easy to try and position yourself out of anything either.

You can eliminate a lot of issues with even 2 subs, if you have freedom of placement. 

@akgwhiz wrote

Fidelity of each sub notwithstanding. There have been many threads based on DBA and this topic.  @deep_333 that looks awesome.  But since room nodes occur at even fractions of room dimensions (1, 1/2, 1/4) it might be optimal to have 2 of the 4 at odd ratios like 1/3 of the wall lengths.  But if one has a dedicated space and sitting location (most here do that), maybe this isnt a worthy consideration. That was my takeaway from my reading and understanding of the virtues of multi subs.  Personally haven't gotten past 2 subs, lol.

Try a vertical 4 driver sub with drivers at height like a tekton 4-10. I doubt that guy ever makes a profit selling subs like that for $860. His profit margin probably only covers a wendy's burger and a scooters coffee.

@buellrider97 wrote

Gentlemen, if I may ask a somewhat lame question please. Stacking subs Vs subs that have multiple front facing drivers ( 2 or 4 ) in the same enclosure with a single amp, are they comparable? I’d like to run multiple subs, but I can’t afford to pony up for 4. Also any comments on the Audiokinesis  Swarm is appreciated. I’m currently cash strapped and hoping to do something with a $3K budget. Thank you, Mike B. 

@deep_333 , Thank you for the advise. I have Tekton DI’s on Townshend Podiums. My question was veiled as I didn’t want to mention the Tekton subs , but that’s exactly what I was curious about. I can’t afford 4 REL’s , so it would probably boil down to a pair of SVS, Tektons or a Swarm. I’m currently running a modest SS kit amp. As soon as I get some balanced cables and relocate my TV, I’ll run the DI’s with 180 watt tube monos, but I still want subs. What’s your thoughts on the 4-10’s Vs the 2-10’s ? Regards , Mike B. 

Since your double impact has some legit ~30hz extension,  you could see if you room permits a [1/4,1/4], [1/4, 3/4] location for them, at which point they can also serve as part of the distributed bass array (this depends on your room size, of course).

It would imply that you put the 2 subs behind you at the [3/4, 1/4] [3/4, 3/4] or [3/4, 0] [ 3/4,1] locations and you would technically have a 4 sub array, where the double impacts also serve as quasi-subs.

Almost always, the ideal position for 2 subs would be behind the listening position if you have full-ish range speakers.

$640 for the 2-10 vs $860 for the 4-10...4-10 sounds like a better deal to me, especially since you can get physical drivers at the heightwise null locs with the 4-10.

@buellrider97 wrote

@deep_333 , Thank you for the advise. I have Tekton DI’s on Townshend Podiums. My question was veiled as I didn’t want to mention the Tekton subs , but that’s exactly what I was curious about. I can’t afford 4 REL’s , so it would probably boil down to a pair of SVS, Tektons or a Swarm. I’m currently running a modest SS kit amp. As soon as I get some balanced cables and relocate my TV, I’ll run the DI’s with 180 watt tube monos, but I still want subs. What’s your thoughts on the 4-10’s Vs the 2-10’s ? Regards , Mike B. 

@lewinskih01

In my case, going from 2 Rythmiks F12 to 4 didn't make the bass louder (as I did adjust the power to a target) and I couldn't tell if they were distorting less (they weren't to start with), but the improvement came from a more homogeneous bass response across the room.

Going from 2 subs to 4 subs helps with better bass distribution but it's not he same as if you coupled/stacked them together.  When you couple them its a new subwoofer that has twice the power and twice the cone area. It will far outperform and move more air, with more force than any of the single subs. 2 double stacks will outperform 4 single units spread around the space.

This is the same reason why at pro concerts the subs are always stacked in a cluster rather than spread around when output is the goal. 

@lewinskih01    A good analogy is each of your subs are capalble of generating a certain size wave. All 4 of them are generating the same size wave in different locations evenly around the room.

If you stack them they now become 2 units instead of four but they each push double power and double cone area and can create 2 much LARGER waves. Almost double the size!!! Big powerful waves instead of 4 little waves.

It's physics. It's how it works.