Is AI taking over audio gear research?


an audio dealer recommends talking to AI.  

It's getting better and better and better. I think ai deep analysis of all things audio is impressive to the nth degree.  Of course eventually you're gonna have to listen to something before making a purchase decision.

a lot depends on Web available source data and it's difficult to get a sense as to how extensive available material is being reviewed by AI, clearly it's vast.  The truly impressive aspects are continuing to improve inference capabilities. I am far from an expert in audio stuff but I do recognize some really impressive comments being made by AI. I find myself asking lots of questions about certain gear and asking for comparisons to other gear. I have a running thread that's probably the length of the Bible at this point and that's the better way to do it rather than doing a bunch of individual threads although now ChatGPT is accessing all the threads so it may not matter much but it's still better to keep it all within one extended thread.  I approach things with healthy skepticism.

ai takes initiative. It anticipate things I have not thought of. I am using ChatGPT pro. I think free Gemini AI sucks and make lots of errors.

I don't type into ChatGPT I dictate everything and that makes it more effective. I can use extended thoughts and questions and basically compose several sentences of content before I submit.  It can handle lots of twisted info. 

I thought I'd share all this. 

 

 

emergingsoul

It's really good for getting specs/details on products you already know something about, even it it's just the name.

Beats manually looking at a bunch of websites. 

As an example, I recently asked it to compare 2 specific cables, one of which I own, and the conclusion was most likely a lateral move. Obviously I would need to listen to both to prove that, but the logic made perfect sense.

 

We're going to be getting to the point where AI is the OP, AI provides most of the responses, and nobody cares.

The Editor in Chief of The Absolute Sound, in an editorial several months ago, talked about how he’d written an article, and AI, without his input, regurgitated a stream of information - and none of it was what he’d said. He said, in fact, that the systems it put together were not even the ones he’d suggested.

This is a followup column on the subject.

 

https://www.theabsolutesound.com/articles/from-the-editor-teach-a-man-to-fish/

I use Microsoft Copilot AI extensively but would not make a final purchase decision based only on it. Its responses are always clear and organized. Like the OP, I am amazed at the quality of the responses I usually (but not always) get.

Some in the forum may have formed negative opinions based on AI versions of 6 mths or more ago. If so, try it again. It is progressing at a similar speed as D-amps! There is a big difference in responses I get now compared to 6 mths ago.

When Copilot says something wrong, I tell it. Copilot responds with an apology, admission of "guilt" and an analysis of where it went wrong. Then it restates what it had incorrectly said in a corrected manner.  I wish some of the people around me were as forthcoming when corrected.