I apologize. I got my models mixed up. I own the Record Dr. X. It cleans both sides at once. And is motorized. And I just checked and it is not discontinued. It would be a deal breaker for me if I had to manually turn the record or flip it over in order to clean both sides. In my opinion the Record Dr. X is well worth the extra money. You will thank yourself in the future for spending the extra cash and going with the Record Dr. X. They are very popular at their price point so they are often difficult to find in stock right now. But they have not been official discontinued. You can preorder them now. And wait for the next batch to arrive.
Any opinions on Record Doctor VI?
I am in the process of cleaning my brother (in-law's) vinyl collection and refurbishing his kit to pass on to his son. I'm also cleaning my vinyl collection which brings the total to between 400-500 records. I've been using Neil Antin's method which provides great results, however it takes far more time than I can allocate to accomplish the task. I have done a significant amount of research on RCMs and am leaning towards the RD VI which seems to be at good intersection of cost and performance.
I would greatly appreciate input from any RD VI users in this community as to its effectiveness, ease of use, longevity, or any other salient points. The records are mostly from the 60's and 70's and while "cleaned" before playing, the method was the famed DiscWasher brush and fluid.
- ...
- 16 posts total
@flash56 The X looks like a nice machine. I guess one needs to decide if they are willing to pay 2x the price for the convenience of the X or if they can live with a more manual machine that will clean a record just as well. I chose the VI and am happy with it, but now you've got me thinking about the X, thanks a lot |
The RD, Humming Bird , Spin Dr., GooveWasher are all surface cleaners. The only way to deep clean is with a UC. A lot of these surface cleaners just push the debris deeper into grooves. And while the record looks nice and shiny it plays with the lack of dynamics. If I owned a record store I would want something a little more stable. But I only use my stuff occasionally. Also with my setup I can use my shop vac for other projects around house/garage. And it is a lot stronger than the RD. I understand that it is a bit of a hassle to set up, spin by hand and have to flip record over. But for $100 it seemed like a nice option. And please, Record cleaning solutions are snake oil. There are only 3 ingredients used. 99.9% Distilled water. The other 0.1% Isopropyl Alcohol and Tegretol. I see MOFI is selling PUR Water for $30 a quart. Distilled water at grocery store, with a ppm of 0, is a dollar. You can't get cleaner than 0. I don't care how many times you filter through same filter. Please spend your money wisely and buy more vinyl.
|
OP I have the RD VI and works for me. As others have said, it is loud. and if you're going to clean bout 200 records, then that will take some time as this is a manual drive. but yes, it cleans well. I have to say, it takes about 2 passes per side to clean well. I have not tried any Ultrasonic, but as others have posted, that may be the correct solution for you if your records are dirty. if you are going to buy new, I suggest that you look into the RD X which is auto mated. OR look completely into an Ultrasonic. |
I recently bought a RD VI off eBay. It was barely used - I saved about $100 compared to buying new. I’m very pleased with the results. What a vacuum does is suck out all the gunk that the brush and cleaning solution loosen. I don’t think you can really get the record clean without a vacuum, but I’m not that familiar with how some of the more expensive ultrasonic RCMs work. I bought the Disc Doctor Brush and Miracle cleaner from Acoustic Sounds. I can’t compare it to other products, but it seems to work very well. |
- 16 posts total

