People should not be offended if someone wants to pay $800K+ for a pair of speakers. I know people who place bets on sporting events of $750K. If you are making $1 million a day, do you really care about cost vs. state of the art? Don’t think so. It may not be what I would spend on a system, but I am no where near that league.
As for Wilson’s pricing decisions . . . They are in business to make money, not to charge for assembling parts. There are numerous hidden costs, such as R&D, salaries, cost of manufacturing facilities, insurance, benefits, taxes . .. in other words, there are all sorts of costs that go into making a speaker besides adding up the cost of the parts and the mystery materials. I am not trying to justify Wilson’s or any other manufacturer’s pricing decisions, especially regarding the aforementioned $110K for a custom paint, which under any theory seems ridiculously excessive, but microeconomic theory says that if your pricing is not at the intersection of supply and demand, you will lose money, which in theory causes price correction. Isn’t that the ultimate issue? Don’t like the price, don’t buy it?

