How many watts do you really need?


According to the president of D'Agostino, he and others make amps that are way more watts than any of us will ever need and almost none of them stay in class A very long.

 

https://www.headphonesty.com/2026/06/president-amps-admitted-class-watts-wasted-heat/?utm_source=fb&utm_campaign=comment

roadcykler

The answer is - it depends.

My Fender Princeton is rated at 12 watts and is capable of ear splitting volume when turned up half way. But I wouldn't want to replay music through it.

4 simple statements which oyu must trade off

1. depends on efficiency of speakers

2.  ... and how loud you listen and your room size

3, Volume is correlated to power in watts logarithmically so 10X the power yields 2x the volume. Its. closing game

4. But, all things considered, more is better  for a bunch of reasons

(but things are not equal necessarily since more plower costs money that might otherwise go into, say, better parts)

So everything else is a simple opinion, a data points or misleading.  Figure it out with facts. 

 

My CODA #16 (that I sold) had the first 100 watts in Class A and total of 150 | 300 | 600 watt @ 8 | 4 | 2 Ohm. Compared to other amps that I owned that were 500+ watts at 8 Ohm and more at lower Ohm. The CODA was much more powerful. That was because the power supply on the lower wattage CODA was a beast.

I now own the slightly warmer CODA #11 which is a lot cheaper and matches a bit better than the #16 to my system. The #11 is also has the first 100 in Class A and is almost as powerful as the #16.

@kennyc Not me but the Gryphon company seems to believe so, as do a lot of people. “Pure Class A operation has, since we introduced the DM100 in 1991, always been a Gryphon hallmark, because no other circuit topology can match its sonic perfection,”

 

@gkelly They're quoting actual humans from very respected companies. The fact that you discount anything from that website says more about you than them.