@elliottbnewcombjr, thanks for that additional help. However even entering the 600 you suggested resulted in too narrow distortion. Any other suggestion to avoid multiple experiments? @tomic601, ;^) I agree, why is their system so complicated? I couldn't believe contacting Amazon and being told to ask another member who succeeded in phoning a photo. |
| Post removed |
I post more photos than anyone on the forum, ask anybody! when you enter 600 in the WIDTH box, make sure it’s only 600, sometimes an image’s dimensions are automatically put there and you need to backspace to get rid of them, enter 600 in an empty box aspect ratio is retained, so no need to enter a height ............................. your system photo, that Marcel Breuer chair was my favorite while studying Interior Design at Pratt in Brooklyn in the 60’s. Someone should have bought a warehouse full of them, locked it, waited 50 years. On sale, $3,400. https://www.knoll.com/shop/en_us/living-lounge-chairs/wassily-chair/7852.html |
@elliottbnewcombjr, I did enter 600 in the Width box but it came our compressed. This looks fairly good in your post but needed better exposure. I first tried flash but that reflected in the TV. I was in a hurry so just turned off the flash here. However what I wanted to post on a different subject was my record racks. I’ll try again, verifying the 600. I tried twice more. First verifying the 600 was entered, but still compressed. I tried once more, and when I entered the URL numbers appeared for W and H. Those looked proportional so I OK'ed that. I still saw the horizontal compression. ??? |
| Post removed |
