@truebluephil It would probably be better to leave politics out of it as much as possible even if humorous.
@sparksgja I think there is a problem invoking a moral or ethical standard on what is by any measure a commodity for which there is no fundamental need. The artists, the venues, the promoters, the ticket franchises are all in it together. How they feed off of each other might be a subject for ethical speculation, but how they feed off of us really isn't. Make no mistake, even though I hate these high prices I am willfully participating and so are the 10,000 people who are going to be there that night and night after night all across the country as this band sells out shows.
I'm not suggesting that we not vote with our feet. It is the only option we really have. I'm generally right there with you. I especially have no desire to go see older artists who haven't done anything original in decades for $1000 a pop.
As for big money for bad shows. That's another story. When you don't get your money's worth that's a problem. Usually word gets out. Someone in this thread mentioned that they'd seen this band twice and enjoyed the show but didn't feel it was worth this type of money.
To be honest, I don't expect to get $300 worth out of this show. Throw in being there with good friends helps.
But, I've moaned and complained about how band based music is a a dying breed and how there's nothing new and compelling out there. For me this is one of a number of bands who are the exception to that trend. And to be honest I am mesmerized by this band and the lead singer's voice/stage presence. It seems like something special and unique (at least for the last 50 years anyway). They're kind of what I've been waiting for years. It might be smoke and mirrors but I just got a gut felling that I needed to see this band in person.

